these kind of attacks in the near future - especially in our schools and colleges?
How is Bush going to keep us safe against these Attacks?
2007-04-17 01:24:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Great Question.. The investigation is underway. I just answered a question in which the disingenuous tried to mock your question.
These Lemmings can not have it both ways... The Great Protector can protect us half way across the world but can't do the job at home..... ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC.... Well done for pointing this out.
EDIT: see for yourself..http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070417060026AA2uUIG&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMhjJdUVyB4rZNl7O2xs2hYs2VyGpePrSYoAFthiMX.qEJUgDXd46gwkKbjx267d3oAQ--&paid=answered#TMR8WTrqWDHgQHSUwspJMRpjSUOtj1GVMSDYelz0F59cTOVwKEuN
2007-04-17 02:09:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no indication this was a domestic terrorist plot. One would think that if it was, there would have been more campuses attacked at the same time.
It is possible that more attacks will happen in the future, but this is not something that is confined to schools. It happens at shopping malls, businesses, playgrounds, etc.
Why is it Bush's fault? I believe it was the gunman's fault. The university has some blame also, because they don't allow guns on campus, which could have put a stop to this madman. Oh, the no guns on campus and the fact that murder is illegal didn't seem to stop this individual.
2007-04-17 01:39:15 · answer #2 · answered by garfieldkat 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Will there be a backlash adversarial to Asians? in all likelihood. no longer as radical because the backlash adversarial to center-Easterners after September 11th, for sure. The backlash I mean is making Koreans the butt of shoot-em-up jokes and it makes the Asian community to develop into the objective of a few comedians that base their acts on racial discrimination. notwithstanding, there'll be the few which will rant about their hatred in route of Koreans because of this--no longer inevitably because they're outraged, yet extra out of the terror of a few thing like this taking position lower back. yet those human beings want to comprehend that a persons ethnicity would not play an element in giving them psychological instability as Seung Cho had.
2016-12-04 04:31:19 · answer #3 · answered by cruickshank 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
had nothing to do with Bush...some angry and messed up kid, who had severe mental and emotonal issues. Why is that when something goes wrong....everyone is so quick to point to Bush..I am not favoring bush at all..but hello????? Was he on campus....did he pull the trigger....was he the asian student living on campus? NO!!! damn....I am just a mother of an engineering student!!!
2007-04-17 01:47:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it is very early to come to any conclusion regarding this most unfortunate event. My heart goes out to all those suffering from this senseless violence. One wonders if more folks had weapons, perhaps someone would have ended this murderous rampage without such great loss of life.
2007-04-17 01:36:13 · answer #5 · answered by david42 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I am no fan of Bush, but these attacks were happening long before he took office.
2007-04-17 01:34:52 · answer #6 · answered by Runa 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand why this isn't considered a terrorist attack. If the shooter had taken a car bomb and driven into the school it would have been considered a terrorist attack. Even if he had killed far less people, a car bomb would have immediately classified it as a terrorist attack. He went into a school and opened fire on innocent people for Christs sake.......... he torrorized those people, so as far as i'm concerned, he was a terrorist and it was a terrorist attack.
2007-04-17 01:59:17 · answer #7 · answered by Kijarra 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush is not responsible for this! One or maybe two individuals did it -students who went to college there even. Its no different than Columbine or any of the other shooting sites.The government cant control everything for crying out loud.
2007-04-17 01:33:41 · answer #8 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Aaaah...the conspiracy theorist begins his rant.
Pose a question of strained logic.
Next step, whine when your question is not adequately answered in a short time frame. Of course, someone *else* has to provide the answer, conspiracy theorists do not do scientific research, only speculation that others have to confirm or deny.
When others do not adequately answer your question, one which *YOU* do not have the persistence to run to ground, begin to speculate that there is a cover up.
Draw your bizarre conclusion. Because you asked your question, and *others* did not confirm or deny it, declare that it must be true. Use the presumed *cover up* as confirmation.
Loons...all loons.
Dear Paul...while it is the job of the federal government to provide for the *common* defense, it is *your* job to provide for your own *individual* defense. The second amendment guarantees you this right.
Addition: Poor Humanist...his answer belies his true feelings, that his own safety is to be provided by *SOMEONE ELSE*
2007-04-17 01:48:51 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, they were a result of a stupid nation allowing every dumbcluck citizen to have a gun. Until they change this then yes, you can expect more of the same. Bush can keep you safe by changing your stupid constitution, but dont hold your breath - he doesnt dare do it.
2007-04-17 01:33:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋