English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

• Avivim school bus massacre, Israel by Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP); 1970
• Ma'alot massacre, Israel by DFLP (see [1]); 1974

• École Polytechnique Massacre - Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 1989
• Concordia University massacre - Montreal, Quebec, Canada; August 24, 1992
• Dunblane massacre - Dunblane, Scotland, United Kingdom; March 13, 1996
• Sanaa massacre - Sanaa, Yemen; 1997

• Osaka school massacre - Ikeda, Japan; 2001
• Erfurt massacre - Erfurt, Germany; 2002
• Monash University shooting - Melbourne, Australia; October 21, 2002
• Beslan school hostage crisis - Beslan, Russia; 2004
• Dawson College shooting - Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 2006
• • Beirut Arab University shooting - Beirut, Lebanon

2007-04-17 00:15:09 · 6 answers · asked by ThorGirl 4 in Politics & Government Politics

these are all school shootings, if the students and/ or teachers were armed would it have hppened? I think not.

2007-04-17 03:03:02 · update #1

6 answers

Gun laws don't keep killers from killing people with guns.

Gun laws just provide unarmed victims.

2007-04-17 00:18:23 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 7 3

You are lumping different situations into one group. The Beslan attack was designed to start a war. However, if you really want to know why these people did what they did, you need to ask the people who pulled the trigger. If I had been armed and in that classroom in Virginia, I would have defended the lives of those around me dealing with the threat of lethal force with the use of lethal force - in this case, it would have been clearly justified. And in case you're wondering, I'm a Democrat, and not a conservative.

2007-04-17 02:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 0 0

I feel it is all Judas Priest's fault. That's who brought on the entire suicides whilst I was once in prime university. Note to batgirl--In God We Trust was once placed on U.S. forex in 1957 accordingly of an act handed in 1955 or 1956. It gave the impression on a few cash in 1864 and on all cash after 1873. So, it is not been 1000s of years. It's been over 50 at the forex and 134 at the cash. Do your study.

2016-09-05 15:15:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You are at the mercy of those choosing to bear arms and use you for target practice. You are at the mercy of mad men. The ones that make weak laws.

2007-04-17 00:43:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't like Libs, nosire.

2007-04-17 01:32:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

they relied on cell phones and panic buttons,put their lives in the hands of local government to come rescue them ,played dead ,prayed to god to save them.had no guns available to them ,to protect themselves from such attacks,just one smith&wesson 9mm would have saved them all ,in the right hands,anyone that thinks guns are responsible for killing is wrong,..go team Bush go

2007-04-17 00:21:44 · answer #6 · answered by decider JR 3 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers