Anything is possible...God was pretty funny with the animals he created...and the all the ones that have evolved since then...
2007-04-16 19:24:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by fancyfelines87 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At its widest point the lake is only 1/2 mile wide. You can see acrossed it. Along its entire length, houses are crowded around. In all these years there has been no photo that is not a hoax even though many people want to show 'Nessy' is real. Now how long do you think this thing can hold its breath? A pleisiosaur has to breath air!
So unless 'Nessy' is nothing more than a big fish...NO!
2007-04-17 00:20:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jeff Sadler 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it doesn't exist. After this many years, they would have found some evidence, like dead fish, teeth marks, dead body of large monster-looking animal etc. There has been nothing. When blanket webcam coverage was instituted, no more images appeared. With the advent of focus-free and digital cameras, there should have been more photos, instead, they have stopped coming.
Nessie will remain as an enigmatic creature, who existed only in people's imagination. She will probably still draw tourists to Loch Ness for many years to come.
2007-04-16 20:57:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Labsci 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would love to believe so. However, after five years of Nessie hunting both above and below the waterline, Scotland On Line's research grant has now been terminated. Accordingly they have closed our webcams and their site. www.lochness.scotland.net.
I'm guessing no one really believes in the Loch Ness Monster anymore. Maybe it's time they turned their attention towards, Bigfoot.
2007-04-16 18:59:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by armstrongdouglas 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think about how much fish one of those would have to eat. Then think about how much a breeding population would have to eat. Compare the foraging range required by animals of similar size. The lakes just not big enough.
2007-04-16 23:11:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plesiosaur fossils were originally discovered in the British Isles. It's not impossible that some could have survived.
2007-04-16 18:20:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ben 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but Bigfoot likely does. All people seem to see are logs and water turning over so it seems highly unlikely.
2007-04-16 18:21:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes i think it does. I have a very long explanation for what it could be, feel free to email me if u want to see it
2007-04-16 19:18:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well the finance that's generated from this definitely does. Ask Lloyd's TSB, they will say YES!
2007-04-16 18:32:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea, why not. The gorrilla didn't exist 'officialy' until the 1940's.
2007-04-16 18:25:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Not Ready to Make Nice 2
·
1⤊
0⤋