still looking for weapon of mass destruction?

Question

this is the real weapon of mass destruction
George Herbert Walker Bush
George Walker Bush
Richard Bruce Cheney
Paul Wolfowitz
World Bank
IMF International Monetary Fund

what Americans should know before go to vote again?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXmQPCcuGjo&mode=related&search=

Answer 1

The Republicans need to be put out of power for a very long time.

Answer 2

I wish people would watch the History Channel. There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. What most are not telling everyone else is that the good old US of A supplied them to Saddam to battle off Iran. That's also why the military came across millions of USA dollars that were also provided by America to help Saddam's cause against Iran when Saddam was finally caught.

Answer 3

I observed Donald Rumsfeld being interviewed with regard to the U. S. getting into Afghanistan on a Sunday morning television teach. whilst he grow to be asked how long he predicted the militia to be there he appeared today up (as a replace of into the interviewer's face) earlier answering. That advised me approximately each little thing i necessary to comprehend, that we'd no longer get out interior some months or years through fact it grow to be planned for a protracted time earlier 9-11. Osama grow to be in basic terms an excuse in my opinion and not the clarification.

Answer 4

“We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories … And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them."
—George W Bush Washington, D.C., May 30, 2003

"Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" — George W. Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, Washington, D.C., March 24, 2004

Answer 5

So you've never seen evidence, or photos for that matter, of the chemical attacks Saddam unleashed on the Kurds? Yes chemical weapons are WMDs. Besides, with all the hobnobbing threats that the UN gave to Saddam, he could've swam the entire length of the Amazon river and back and still destroyed or moved his stockpile to Syria!

Answer 6

Actually we hung the weapon of mass destruction a few months ago.

Answer 7

Funny when a Democrat states that the were WMDs in Iraq no one on the left disagreed.

Answer 8

There had to be weapons of mass destructions there in Iraq you twit how else would have Sadam Killed 100,000 Kurds with one bomb. The reason they wern't found is because of the Liberal fricken Press, and the French who are holding them.

Answer 9

all the peace loving people fully agrees with you.one can find not weapons of mass destruction but hegemony of the us president causing mass genocide.

Answer 10

of course there were WMD, do you really believe saddam when he said he didn't send them to syria? any case, i feel we did good by taking out someone who should have been removed after gasing the kurds. sure there are terrorists from all over the mid east in iraq. why not stay and take them out, otherwise we will just spend money sending them to afghanistan where the same type of warfare is happening like iraq ( carbombs ), and where the terrorists in iraq would move to.