personally, i think that it matters who the person in the pants are. they have 2 suit the person.. u know? for example, Pete Wentz is super hott sxc in tight pants... other guys that try out... uh... not so much. but in my school theres this hott gr. 9 and he wears baggy pants and it totally suits him and MAN does he look hott in them!!!
2007-04-16 16:46:00 · 13 answers · asked by Love is you. 4 in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
um... excuse me... drippy emos?!? is that wut someone said... excuse me but i happen 2 love emos 2 bits and u shouldn't pick on them just they're hotter than YOU!!! Ohhhhh BURN!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-16 16:57:19 · update #1
Mmm... I guess both. Kinda, like tight-but-baggy. But that's just me.
2007-04-16 16:50:03 · answer #1 · answered by ourtimenow x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it is completely dependent on weight and the guy's butt. If you weigh over 160 lbs and you are under 5'10" I think that tight pants are out of the question, unless most of that weight comes from muscle or there isn't that little fat wave that a lot of girls have hanging over their pants that is absolutely horrific. But if the guys has no butt, like I do, then a tight straight legged works well, but if the guys is sporting some gorgeous pant-mellons a pair of bell bottoms just makes me melt. I have to wear mainly baggy jeans, though I have no butt, as my legs are extremely bulky because I usually leg press around 1900lbs, but I think that it is a fair trade and my wife doesn't have to carry a purse thanks to spacious pockets, which I think is a major plus. But in most cases, the hotter the guy is, the tighter his pants must be, as a public service to all of us who will never get into them.
2007-04-16 16:56:57 · answer #2 · answered by shabushabu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you that the pants have to suit the wearer and vice versa, but in all honesty...boys should wear boys pants. I don't like Emo's and I hate the style. Only because it just looks ridiculous...tight pants on a male...it just looks gross to me. I prefer a regular fit, slightly baggy. Not skinny/tight and not super baggy to where the pants are halfway down their thigh.
2007-04-16 17:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by H.L.A. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i for my area like the in between extra healthful. no longer too saggy and not too tight. yet I easily do in comparison to those that carry down exhibiting the underclothes. they appear as if they have crapped of their pants and strolling around with it. so a good distance as my age is going... permit's merely say that i'm over 30.
2016-12-29 03:06:14 · answer #4 · answered by arai 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What if you just wore pants like they were suppose to be worn?? Wear them so they fit... And I AGREE with the guy above saying "drippy emo".
2007-04-17 18:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by Joseph C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tight isn't right baggy is the way to go tight and you have problems down there like wearing tight underwear
2007-04-16 18:22:32 · answer #6 · answered by big 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tight.....baggy just make it look like they have a load in their pants
2007-04-16 16:55:11 · answer #7 · answered by Angie R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on the size of the male but if he is at average height and weight i say fitted to be safe. baggy isn't too much in fashion anymore, and tight isn't for everyone
2007-04-16 19:33:12 · answer #8 · answered by Sadiq 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, i prefer tight skinny jeans on a guy!!! & "emo" guys are hot, when they wear tight skinny jeans!!! i personally hate to see guys with baggy saggy pants!!!
2007-04-16 17:41:36 · answer #9 · answered by *atomickitty* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
baggy jeans i think it is just weird when they wear tight jeans
2007-04-16 16:49:14 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ηic☮ℓë♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋