Life is actually a series of "nows", physically that is.
but half of us have left their hearts at the past,
and the other half have their minds wandering in the future.
it's not enjoyable to completely have a suite of nows.
you'd never miss anything, you'd never anticipate anything.
Most of all, you'd never grow, you'd never learn.
2007-04-16 17:03:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by enki 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes. u are asking this question because i think u think that the person who enjoy the now and lives and thinks just about now and don't worry much about future is the perfect human Right? but i think there isn't any think like that. i think what ever humans do is what the are made to do . if u think this way that is good if u think that way is good. we just can think nothing else, u cant make others think the way u think.people will do what they do. life is a mystery and i think its just my thought and that is the only think i can do i think. i think every thing in this universe is predestined like a cycle of happenings. Evey thing happens because some thing happened before it and because some thing happend before so some thing will happen in future. are u getting me???
2007-04-17 01:08:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by raj 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. I highly recommend considering "this" time of your life as the time you worked so hard in the past to enjoy. We're taught to work hard so we can live the "good" life. But at what point do we say..."now's the time to live the good life?" You have to eventually choose "now" to start the good living that you've been working so hard to achieve. And what better "time" than the present?!? My younger self worked damn hard for my present self, and it would dishonor him not to enjoy my "right now." My younger self overcame some incredible tests of survival (piece of cake) and now I thank him for his quick reflexes...see ya at the beach with an alcoholic blended iced drink in a frosted glass, toasting the absence of flourescent office ceiling lights...that's life...aloha! Peace and love, whoever you are...
2007-04-17 01:37:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
By necessity.
"Real Possibility
§ 147
[c] When this externality (of actuality) is thus developed into a circle of the two categories of possibility and immediate actuality, showing the intermediation of the one by the other, it is what is called Real Possibility. Being such a circle, further, it is the totality, and thus the content, the actual fact or affair in its all-round definiteness. While in like manner, if we look at the distinction between the two characteristics in this unity, it realises the concrete totality of the form, the immediate self-translation of inner into outer, and of outer into inner. This self-movement of the form is Activity, carrying into effect the fact or affair as a real ground which is self-suspended to actuality, and carrying into effect the contingent actuality, the conditions, i.e. it is their reflection-into-self, and their self-suspension to another actuality of the actual fact. If all the conditions are at hand, the fact (event) must be actual; and the fact itself is one of the conditions: for being in the first place only inner, it is in fact itself only pre-supposed. Developed actuality, as the coincident alternation of inner and outer, the alternation of their opposite motions combined into a single motion, is Necessity."
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/sl/slactual.htm#SL147
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/li_terms.htm
2007-04-16 23:38:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2007-04-16 23:32:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Turd Ferguson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋