It wouldn't surprise me, the fat loudmouth pig.
2007-04-16 16:07:45 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Need you ask? lol (Thanks for the laugh on such a crappy day.)
2007-04-16 16:15:00 · answer #1 · answered by I like cheese 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I haven't watched The View since she became a host. The last I heard, she was hanging upside down like a bat for depression. Before that it was that crap about Donald Trump.
I happened upon the show today as I was searching for the news about VT and I couldn't believe it. The first words out of her mouth as she was spouting off were, "Donald Trump..."
She was STILL RANTING about him and that whole thing?
All that being said, I am sure you are right. She will make this her new soapbox, but I aint' sticking around to watch it.
2007-04-16 16:16:28 · answer #2 · answered by NONAME 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The woman is literally losing her mind on television now. It really wouldn't surprise me. Honestly, if a student or teacher had access to a gun at the University in the first place, who's to say the death toll could have been lessened?
As far as Rosie is concerned, she is literally insane. I mean who believes that fire cannot melt steel?
2007-04-16 16:16:47 · answer #3 · answered by Clark Kent 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Just like FOX News will find some way to blame this incident at VT on the Liberal press or the Clinton's.
2007-04-17 01:06:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Rosie O'Dumb-Bell will use this as another opportunity to try to revoke the 2nd Amendment.
The irony of the whole matter is that the liberal president of the school is to blame as much as anyone. He refused to let his security people carry firearms because it went against his liberal values of "all guns bad". He also went out of his way to infringe on the 2nd Amendment rights of the students who had concealed carry permits who could of stopped this tragedy.
Yes the shooter is to blame for this, but don't give this liberal bums a pass on gross negligence.
2007-04-16 16:21:01 · answer #5 · answered by steve d 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who cares? By discussing this woman we are giving her legitimacy. Her opinions carry the same clear-headed power of my precious tabby cat's.
I think the reason she's been so grouchy of late is because not even lesbians want to be with a woman like her.
2007-04-16 16:16:21 · answer #6 · answered by Gonzo Rationalism 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You do comprehend that "gun administration" does no longer inevitably mean "gun banning". Backgroung checks are gun administration. Licensing is gun administration. Forbiding the sale of guns to little ones is gun administration. Issuing guns to approved body guards is gun administration.
2016-12-04 04:08:28 · answer #7 · answered by sanderlin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's tacky and will exploit even the most tragic situations to make her point so I wouldn't be surprised if she did.
2007-04-16 16:15:14 · answer #8 · answered by Michelle L 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can guarantee it. That woman is bat-sh it crazy! And I am sure she will cook up a conspiracy theory or two to go along with it.
2007-04-16 16:15:03 · answer #9 · answered by ppaper.wingss 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rosie will probably use it as an attack against gays and lesbians.
2007-04-16 16:11:20 · answer #10 · answered by Mav 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably. Any excuse to run her mouth.
2007-04-16 16:12:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋