Unless the child is adopted or they used a sperm donor, it is impossible for the baby to have type O blood.
If they do not have other children, he needs to get a lawyer and get to court fast. Otherwise he'll be supporting a child that isn't his.
If they do have other children, he'll have to figure out how to suck it up and get over it so he can be full-time dad to his own children too.
2007-04-16 15:41:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Otis F 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Theoretically, they can only have a baby which is A or B. This is because the Dad must give an A or a B gene. If the baby has an A or a B gene, it cannot be type O. A baby with type O indicates a different dad so he should get a lawyer. There are some other, very unlikely causes (like a sudden mutation) that really would almost never happen.
2007-04-16 15:41:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe not get a divorce lawyer, but unless there was a spontaneous mutation, a Type O baby does not have a Type AB father.
The father can give an A allele or a B allele, but cannot give the child an O allele.
This man is not the child's father.
2007-04-16 15:44:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ecolink 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The odds are that the child is not his. He will pass a gene for A or B unless some very rare event occurs. The woman will pass on blood type O. Since AO is Type A and BO is Type B, the child should not be Type O.
2007-04-16 15:41:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The child will inherit either A or B, this according to a blood type predictor, yet freaks in nature do occur and deviate from the norm. Their are dominant and Recessive genes to take into consideration also. Good Luck!
2007-04-16 15:54:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he should get a divorce lawyer asap.
for parents with AB & O blood, their children has equal chances to be A or B blood but definitely not O blood. Here's the combination table:
___A __B
O_AO_BO
O_AO_BO
where AO = A blood, BO = B blood
Sorry, pls ignore the "_"s. I just using it to align the characters cos I cannot make it a proper table in here.
2007-04-16 15:46:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by QiQi 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
you have blood form perplexed with RH factor. If the mum and widespread toddler have opposite RH components, there's a concern for destiny babies, yet there's a medical care. Ask the physician. If the mum would not have the thalassemia gene in any respect, the toddler would be a provider yet won't have it. If the mum is a provider of thalassemia, the toddler has a 50% risk of having it, and actually will nonetheless be a provider. (i'm especially constructive of that, yet examine that with your physician, too.)
2016-10-03 02:35:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say that conventional science would point to all of the other answers, but i do know someone who has O children and it is believed thatthe father was AB. he is no longer with us, but i would be interested to get his actuall medical records to see if the wife has bad memory and blood type of father is not AB.
this is grandmother and grandfather i am talking about, i told granny in 8th grade that grandpa couldn't be my mothers dad, (because of the ABO blood type thing) and i was told in so many words that she was there and there is only one man who is the father of her children, and grandpa is that man.
2007-04-16 16:49:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bio-student Again(aka nursegirl) 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes he should, its this simple
A + A = A
B + B = B
A + B = AB
A + O = A
B + O = B
but only
O + O = O
thus the child cant be his
2007-04-16 15:59:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by diablo_gjones 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea,, its probably not his.. there are very slim possibilities where it might be his.. but most likely.. (actually almost definatly) the child would have to be AO or BO (meaning he is an A type or B type) for the child to be his..
2007-04-19 15:52:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by marduk 1
·
0⤊
0⤋