English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-16 15:02:52 · 6 answers · asked by Affy 2 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

old Vladdy

2007-04-16 15:11:01 · answer #1 · answered by lala 3 · 0 0

They were both cruel. Did you know that Vlad believed that he was doing good. He is supposed to have killed a man's wife because the man's clothes were in disrepair. He then married the man to another woman warning her to not make the same mistake. The report goes on to tell that the wife was beloved and mourned.
Vlad honestly thought that he was doing the right thing. Very sad in truth.

What can you tell me about Attilla the Hun? Was he behaving so to be mean? Was he behaving so because he believed it to be the right thing to do?

The answer might indicate who was truly meaner. Both were cruel.

2007-04-16 15:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by Jack 7 · 0 0

Do you know what is meant by "impaling?" It's tying victims spread-eagle on the ground and driving sharpened stakes into their rectums, then elevating them, where they sometimes die a slow agonizing death. What was the question again?

2007-04-16 15:07:44 · answer #3 · answered by Oxhead 3 · 4 0

well, vlad the impaler IMPALED people. not only were they dead already, he had to insult them by putting their heads on sticks. i'm gonna go with uncle vlad on this one.

2007-04-16 15:05:58 · answer #4 · answered by Olaf J 1 · 1 1

Attila's followers considered him 'a just or even indulgent master'. That accounts for his good reputation in German and Scandinavian epic poetry.

2007-04-16 19:13:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My vote is for Vlad. He was a cruel sumbitch.

2007-04-16 15:05:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers