Should middle names be banned?

Question

It seems like people with three names wreak horrible havoc upon society:

John Wilkes Booth: Assassinated President.Lincoln
Lee Harvey Oswald: Assassinated President Kennedy
James Earl Ray: Assassinated Dr. King
Sarah Jane Moore: Attempted to assassinate President Ford
John Wayne Gacy: Mass murderer
Mark David Chapman: Assassinated John Lennon
William Jefferson Clinton: Got someone's dress dirty and lied about it
Osama bin Laden: Self explanatory
Sarah Jessica Parker: Sex and the City

The most terrible evils in society appear to be wrought by people with three names. Perhaps we need to have a two-name maximum, just to stop all this senseless evil.

P.S. I specifically exempt "Me, Thrice-Baked" from this proposal.

Answer 1

Smokey the Bear, Winnie the Pooh, the list goes on and on...

Answer 2

What about people without middle names?

George Bush (father): plain terrible
Mary Antoinette: Head got cut off
Joseph Stalin: Bad russian communist leader
Kim Jong: North Korean current leader
Lucifer: Satan
Herbert Hoover: President during US Great Depression
Wilhelm Bergdorf: Major Nazi general
Elizabeth Bathory: Killed 600 people
Mary Bell: A 10 year old serial killer.
Napoleon Bonaparte: Probably poisoned
John Landis: Hollywood director illegally cuts corners with dangerous stunts in the making of the Twilight Zone movie. Death and disaster follow.
Marilyn Monroe: Drug overdose
Carl Switzer (Alfalfa): Friend murdered him

You see? People without middle names can create havoc!

Answer 3

search for a lot of factors to be banned and all of them would ought to do with issues that those those who're Conservative value. The fairness Doctrine and the shortcoming of arising an power coverage are 2 in question. Obama suggested he ought to convey the rustic at the same time, yet from the time he has been the nominee the rustic hasn't ever been extra divided. Congress will start up the technique of putting Bush and Cheney on trial and which will truly divide the rustic.

Answer 4

First of all "bin Laden" is all one name. Second of all, most people have middle names the media just chooses to use them on serial killers. By your logic Ghandi (Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi), John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Henry Alfred Kissinger are more likely to be serial killers than David Berkowitz (better known as the Son of Sam), Ted Bundy or William Suff just because they have middle names.

Answer 5

Your premise is terribly flawed. Zillions of people with middle names don't commit crimes against the people or their sensibilities.
Besides, without middle names, how would children know when they were in trouble? Every parent uses all three names to call a child in dutch!

Answer 6

I'll bet you have three names. Most of us do and most of aren't terribly evil. Besides, how would explain Charles Manson, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Jeffery Dahmer, Ted Kazinsky, Ted Bundy, Jim Jones, Timothy McVeigh, etc., etc., etc.?

Answer 7

you're right, people with 3 names DO cause ruckus's, but I think you're headed in the wrong direction with trying to ban middle names. I think it'd be better if everyone had FOUR names... :-)

I could be "Styles Gagan Allen Cole"

Answer 8

nobody gets good satire anymore. its a shame. oh and you forgot george walker bush or john forbes kerry if you are a repub. i had to add some politics

Answer 9

I don't think their names have anything to do with the deeds. It's just that they call them by their full names..

Answer 10

No way!

If those people had no middle name, there actions wouldn't change. Middle names don't change actions, da!