But its legal everywhere else in the state. I think that crazy asian guy would have been stopped earlier if students carried weapons
2007-04-16 13:57:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Puzzling, isn't it? Don't college folks have a right to self defense too?
2007-04-16 14:00:25 · answer #1 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The brainwashed want to leave people in the defense of the congress, the congress wants to leave you defenseless from them. Those are the facts. The 2nd is about defending yourself from a tyrannical congress, period. ANYONE who goes after your weapons is seeking to either support or become a tyrannical government. Just look at Hitler and others, they took the weapons first. I believe that VT is responsible with its rules about weapons on campus, it is a violation of the 2nd amendment. The supreme court ruled that all amendments msust be supported and allowed on schools, anything to the contrary is a violation of the law. Congress has done two things here that make them culpable, the allowed aliens to have constitutional rights, and they will not let anyone search your medical records to see if you are being treated for mental defect prior to purchasing a weapon. I do not want any restrictions on the 2nd but might be inclined to have people verify mental fitness by examination of all medical records. This could not have been prevented. Laws do not prevent crime. Police do not prevent crime. Only an armed citizen could have prevented or at least mitigated this tragedy. And the school and the congress have prevented that from happening.
2016-05-17 05:24:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's state law. You generally do not want guns on a school campus to prevent use. This is a place of learning, and combine with that the fact that the people on campus are stilll dealing for a lot of them with interpersonal issues at this age you don't want guns.
2007-04-16 15:23:12 · answer #3 · answered by caffeyw 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is it legal to carry guns in the state? I think the question must be like that...
2007-04-16 14:03:07 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ PrNcPsS ♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, so in a classroom of 15 - 20 students, an Asian headcase pulls his gun, and 15 -20 students pull theirs, he fires, they fire!
NO Casualties!
BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL DEAD!
NO survivors!
Get real, you do NOT need MORE guns, you need better security!
lol
2007-04-16 14:05:26 · answer #5 · answered by tattie_herbert 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Although students may carry guns, they might not be brave enough to pull the trigger.
2007-04-16 14:03:13 · answer #6 · answered by narutouzumakib 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of incidents like the Virginia Tech shooting that's been all over the news today.
2007-04-16 14:53:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
C'mon Ronald...your question makes no sense whatsoever...
let's put books in the hands of students...not guns.
You don't throw gasoline on a raging fire.
2007-04-16 14:06:59 · answer #8 · answered by GeneL 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is the state law. You need to read the legsilation history of the law.
2007-04-16 13:59:50 · answer #9 · answered by c1523456 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gotta love that mentality...."If everyone has a gun, then no one will get killed." Did you and the Nug discuss that during your pillow talk?
2007-04-16 14:07:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, what did I tell you all in an earlier post. I knew somebody would say it...
2007-04-16 14:00:39 · answer #11 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋