English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What legal action could I take against a service shop or warranty company that ended up charging me money for something that is covered by warranty. Shop worked on my car on a part that warranty covered, and didn't check something they were supposed to check in the process and 1 week later the part they were supposed to check went bad (due to them not checking) my warranty wouldn't cover the labor again (5hrs). in the process service personnel at the shop lied, refused to dispute the warranty company, and on top of it was extremely (to the extreme) rude, called me a liar etc.
In the end service manager ''agreed'' to cover 50% of labor cost (they took the engine apart without my permission and claimed they got my permission over the phone, no signature) and I needed my car to go to work so by this point I had no other choice but to pay the left over part to get my car back.
I am not looking for a quick buck I just want my money back from the last 2 repairs,1st repair I paid deductible

2007-04-16 13:26:38 · 5 answers · asked by hapywee 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

get a lawyer you got screwed, and charge them for the other bills and court costs

2007-04-16 13:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by jim m 7 · 0 0

First off the warranty company did nothing illegal or improper. They paid the claim the 1st time, they don't have to pay a second time just because you took the car somewhere that didn't do all the work.

Next, the company that did the work might be liable. Might is the main word here. You're going to have to prove that they didn't do the work, that they lied about doing it, and that if they didn't do the inspection of the part that they should have known that they needed to do it, and this is just to get the 50% back. If they had no reason to check that part during the process then they can charge you the whole amount, but gave you a break. Just because you warranty says that it should be checked or worked on at same time does NOT mean they knew it should have been checked at the same time. You are the one that was responsible for ensuring that all the work the warranty company required was done, not the warranty company, and not the auto mech unless they where told they had to check this part.

Bottom line sounds like you have a case of not ensuring all the work was done during the inital work. The only way you're going to win is if the car shop knew it should have checked that part, or if it billed for checking that part but didn't check it, and then ONLY from the car shop.

2007-04-16 15:39:53 · answer #2 · answered by caffeyw 5 · 0 1

Unfortunately, sometimes people get screwed. It all revolves around whether you can prove your claims and even if you can prove it, would it cost MORE to recover your expenses than you lost to begin with?
Most attorneys will give you a free consultation about your case and tell you what they think your chances of recovery actually amount are. You should contact some attorneys and ask if they give a free consultation. Since all you want is your money back, maybe they would take the case on a contingency basis. It doesn't cost anything to ask.

2007-04-16 13:36:02 · answer #3 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 0 1

First, every person the following who thinks that a 7 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous might want to be walking to school or everywhere .8 miles on my own doesnt desire to be a be certain. In my city if the school stumbled on out you've been sending your 7 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous to stroll close to to a mile on my own they could in all likelihood call childrens amenities on you and rightfully so. Now that ive were provided that out of ways.... the guidelines are what they are. All you are able to do about it truly is ***** on your city or college board. per chance they are going to change the guideline or make a exception for you. with regards to handicapped, now i comprehend i receives a large number of thumbs downs for this yet i dont care. The handicapped desire equivalent rights. they desire to be treated an same. they say they are no diverse than every person else. yet they get particular rights and privileges which include bus service at the same time as your newborn doesnt. in the experience that they have the right to a bus service then your newborn must have an same proper as well. Myself, i might want to target to make particular arrangements. attempt to locate someone who's using their youngsters on your college who you are able to trust. furnish to pay them even if to get them to swing by and take your children on their way. furnish to purchase them a tank of gas a week.

2016-10-18 01:55:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If the amount is less than the jurisdictional amount for your state's small claims cases, sue them in small claims. Otherwise, you'd be better off getting a lawyer.

In most states, you may have a specific claim under the state's lemon law and a claim under the state's consumer protection law (also known as the state's "mini-FTC Act"),
which allows attorney's fees and costs.

2007-04-16 13:37:44 · answer #5 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers