First Columbine, then 9-11, now this? When will we learn that Victim Disarmament leads to tragedies?
2007-04-16 12:24:16 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It should be. Unfortunately, history suggests it will result in MORE victim disarmament laws. Too many people have bought the LIE that laws prevent crime. Laws only provide for punishment of crimes. Fear of victims shooting back is the only thing that prevents criminals from using guns.
2007-04-16 12:51:40 · answer #1 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah and they will call for people that are not a danger to anyone to give up there's.in fact alot of people own firearms to be able to hunt because when people get older its alot easier on them to use a gun instead of a bow because they lose strength in there arms making it hard to pull back.So not only do gun laws make it easier for bad guys to get them black market etc.. it also in turn hurts the responsible people that need them to survive.because hunting is alot cheaper than going to the grocer and buying meat when you can save by money buying a whole animal to last for along time.
2007-04-20 11:36:13 · answer #2 · answered by Raiden 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's start with disarming criminals and the insane! There is absolutely no such thing as "Victim Disarmament Laws!" If you meet the rules, you can arm yourself however you please. Why would control of deadly weapons be undesireable? We control who can drive, who can teach, who can style your hair - why wouldn't you want rules on who can own something solely intended to kill another human?
2007-04-16 19:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by Mama Gretch 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
If some of the students would have had firearms in their cars, many lives could have been saved.
2007-04-16 19:31:49 · answer #4 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sadly it will not. Instead, there will be mad howls to get rid of all guns...
2007-04-16 19:33:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋