English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can anyone explain the differences between Jungian and Freudian psychology to me? I've Googled it several times but could never find a specific answer. I realize this may be a long answer, so if anyone can direct me to a reliable source(s) that'd be fine as well. Both would be appreciated, and feel free to translate into laymen's terms.

2007-04-16 10:00:42 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

2 answers

I found this in Wikipedia, it's pretty concise:

Jung's primary disagreement with Freud stemmed from their differing concepts of the unconscious. Jung saw Freud's theory of the unconscious as incomplete and unnecessarily negative. According to Jung (though not according to Freud), Freud conceived the unconscious solely as a repository of repressed emotions and desires. Jung believed that the unconscious also had a creative capacity, that the collective unconscious of archetypes and images which made up the human psyche was processed and renewed within the unconscious.

Also found this article on the differences between Freud and Jung:

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-freuds-and-jungs-theories.htm

2007-04-16 11:06:39 · answer #1 · answered by Lee 7 · 0 0

Freud and Jung shared a relationship of many a protracted time, as Jung, the junior companion, found out extra approximately Freud’s theories of the subconscious. possibly thankfully, to fashionable psychology, Jung later got here to reject a number of Freud’s theories, and leant in the direction of his own approach of psychology which he referred to as analytical. the two adult males drew on the assumption of the subconscious as a fashion of explaining targets, yet Jung drew extra on a multi-layered theory of the subconscious. the known ameliorations between Freud and Jung are exciting to observe. a important schism which separates the two psychiatrists pertains to faith. Freud felt faith grew to become into an get away and a fallacy, which will desire to no longer be propagated. His relationship to faith resembles that of Karl Marx. faith grew to become into “opiate” of the loads. His faith grew to become into totally interior the recommendations's skill to get entry to its subconscious recommendations, for this reason curing any neuroses. Jung conversely believed that faith grew to become into an significant place of secure practices for the guy as he or she began the approach of individuation, exploring and accepting all areas of the self. faith added grew to become right into a ability of verbal substitute between all kinds of human beings, because of the fact in spite of the shown fact that religions differed, the archetypes and emblems remained a similar.

2016-12-29 17:21:45 · answer #2 · answered by nail 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers