Many seem to think that wielding two 9mm pistols and shooting into a crowd is enough to produce these kinds of numbers. The lone student murdered more than thirty, A NUMBER GREATER THAN THAT OF THOSE WOUNDED. This is better than a 1:1 ratio of killed to wounded.
Compatively, the two heavily-armed Columbine teens only killed 13 compared to 24 injured. This is almost a 1:2 ratio, making today's tragedy twice as damaging.
Charles Whitman killed 14 from his tower in Austin, Texas compared to 31 injured. Granted this is a longer distance, but the man had military training, and these people were getting hit by large-caliber rifle rounds.
Merely shooting into a crowd (especially with 9mm pistols) produces a lot of injured people and not so many fatally wounded. The skill and training necessary to score rapid critical hits on moving targets isn't found just anywhere.
The official story stinks of incredulity. Thoughts?
2007-04-16
09:43:23
·
9 answers
·
asked by
einzelgaenger08
3
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events