English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just posted a question about an hour ago asking why Liberarals still live here. I clearly stated that I don't mind that they live here inferring they have every right to be here that I do. I made no inferance to them not being allowed to share their viewpoint or dissagree with the government. There are plenty of things I don't agree on.... yes, even with Bush. Yet, like brainwashed little puppets they immediatley start shouting their little talking points as if I was trying to take that away from them. (that would be their party that does stuff like that, i.e. Imus and the "fairness" doctrine). True, you have the right to express your oppinions and try to invoke change. This is just me though, I typically don't tear my country down and give comfort to our enemies in the name of change. I do it at the ballot box and with legitimate debate. Never in wartime, agreed or disagreed, have I ever seen a party try to undermind this country like the Lib/Dems have.

2007-04-16 09:14:28 · 12 answers · asked by Mr. Perfect 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

again, didn't say you had to agree with the war... should I say it again and again? (talking point, talking point) Americans have the right to disagree and debate - when I speak of libs underminding this country I speak of your leaders in Washington who do just that on the congressional or senate floor. You show me in the past... in any wartime, where the president is so hated, and attacked publicly. That is not how to envoke change. Why do you think our enemies sopport the likes of Kerry and Pelosi? Think about it... Bring on the debate Hypo.... Again... didn't say you had to agree with the war bush_is - PLEASE READ! You claim to know how. Our founding fathers would roll over in their graves to see what liberals stand for today.

2007-04-16 09:38:39 · update #1

12 answers

I'm glad some one else is noticing. Just look at this and compare it with the Democrats party goals>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
1963 Communist Goals
Printable Version
The communist goals were entered into the Congressional record by Albert Herlong, Jr. (a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-69).
1) US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2) US willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3) Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the US would be a demonstration of "moral strength."
4) Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5) Extension of long term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites.
6) Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7) Grant recognition of Red China, and admission of Red China to the UN.
8) Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the UN.
9) Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the US has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10) Allow all Soviet Satellites individual representation in the UN.
11) Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo).
12) Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13) Do away with loyalty oaths.
14) Continue giving Russia access to the US Patent Office.
15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US.
16) Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books.
18) Gain control of all student newspapers.
19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.
23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy."
27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man".
31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture": Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35) Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36) Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37) Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.
39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political, or social problems.
43) Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44) Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45) Repeal the Connally Reservation so the US can not prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.

More Information about Albert Herlong, Jr.:

His bio:
http://www.lib.usf.edu/spccoll/guide/f/flarep/hh43.html

The goals that he read were taken from "The Naked Communist" by Cleon Skousen, which can be purchased from Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568493673/

Other Links:
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

2007-04-16 09:31:57 · answer #1 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0 5

As a American, I am tired of this labeling of people as being Liberal or Conservitive. People should look both words up in the dictionary and then decide what they mean.

In any case like I said I am an American, and this labeling of people as conservitive or liberal, is perhaps the most damaging and the main reason we are becoming so split as a people.

Its time the Rich learn they need the poor to keep them rich, and its time the rich give the poor enough to live on wile working for the rich.

It also time working Americans learn to egt off there ***'s and actually work.

It is a two way street. But we are in this country together.

I also would say right now the rich are the ones pushing us to the brink. The rich want Mexican labor for cheap pay, the rich are making a killing from iraq, and the rich beleive they can pa there CEO's 400 million, wile there over pay for emplyees for the same years is around 10 million, split several houndred ways.

The problems are not Liberal conservitive, but rich and poor.

Americans need to understand we need each other or we will devide ourselves.

So I hope the person wants to know if liberals can read, has there mind open enough to know we are all americans

2007-04-16 11:10:43 · answer #2 · answered by candi-o 2 · 0 0

To my Liberal pals: ethical experience of a Conservative by using: Senator Barry Goldwater Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto by using Mark Levin Wealth of international locations by using Adam Smith

2016-12-29 17:16:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I won't try to change your position but if you really research world perception of the U.S. before Bush and afterward, you will discover that it is your own party that has undermined this country. I believe you want the best for this country just as I do. And there is room for your opinion and mine on how to do that. However, the majority of the U.S. and the world at this time believe that Bush (and administration) has taken on his own agenda despite having been advised by his own people against alienating our allies. Read independent news (Not Fox) to learn the truth.

2007-04-16 09:34:52 · answer #4 · answered by David M 6 · 3 0

I find it rather amusing that you would go to such bother to rant about how liberals are supposedly so anti American and give aid to the enemy, and yet you don't even bother to provide one shred of evidence. Perhaps you feel you don't need to, but then again your profile name says it all in my opinion. Have a nice day, and keep drinking that Fox news cool aid.

2007-04-16 09:45:49 · answer #5 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0 0

You accuse people of undermining the country when they clearly feel that they are not doing so - and in fact are trying to keep it from being undermined - and you wonder why they are angry? If you want an honest debate, stop the "comfort for the enemy" stuff and have an honest debate.

2007-04-16 09:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8 0

How about that fairness doctrine. I'd like to see it applied to to EVERYTHING said on the evening mainstream News.
I agree with all you said about their aid and comfort to the enemy.
Giving aid and comfort to an enemy is the definition of TREASON!

2007-04-16 09:31:53 · answer #7 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1 1

Hehe...isn't there some big conspiracy theory about "liberals" running the media and establishments of higher education? Wouldn't that imply that they can indeed read?

2007-04-16 09:24:16 · answer #8 · answered by firstythirsty 5 · 7 0

Donations and Cash only

2007-04-16 09:28:29 · answer #9 · answered by noethics 2 · 1 0

The Founding Fathers were Liberals. Think about it...

2007-04-16 09:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by Rothwyn 4 · 10 1

Yes. We can read.

2007-04-16 09:29:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers