It's a cover to maintain support for an existing plan of US global domination following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The Wolfowitz doctrine was developed by the current administration while Clinton was in office. September 11 was the trigger event to enact this existing plan.
Sick isn't it?
2007-04-16 09:34:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Elmer R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war on terror is a war against terrorism, no matter who or what nationality the terrorist may be. If the majority of the terrorist are Muslims that those kids are right, but as they say, if it walks like a duck!
2007-04-16 16:18:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering that Islamic terrorists - in the past month - have blown up Hindu temples in India, beheaded Christian teachers in the Philippines, executed Buddhist monks in Cambodia and blew up fellow Muslims in Algeria and Iraq it is hard to say that USA is declaring a war on Islam.
Islamic Jihad has targeted Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, atheists, Jews and Christians since Islam was founded 1400 years ago.
Please check the news in countries that are ignored by the media - Islamic terrorism is a major menace in non-Western nations like the Philippines, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Mongolia, India, Algeria, etc.
2007-04-16 16:16:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It sure looks that way on the surface, Some people beleive that if you look deeper, ou will see that it is just a distraction to grab to attention of the masses and the media, while certain nameless people wage a war on personal freedoms.
2007-04-16 16:16:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Niklaus Pfirsig 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'll keep it brief.
The Bush party are I assert must be un-American; this is true I suggest because of what they have done to the constitutional balance of powers.
They are after powers for their imperial concept of an imperial president ruling in an eternal emergency-war situation as an infallible leader, which makes them totalitarians.
They ignore reality, which makes them Postmodernists--deniers of the real, fantasists making up a public sector alternate universe to insist people believe in, as they go along.
They are after cheap Iranian oil to keep the US empire going as it has for a century; in "American Theocracy", Kevin Phillips noted that plans for divvying up Iraq oil were drawn up by Dick Cheney's secret task force before the Bushite Administration ever even took office; such plans have been noted against in the last few months.
No, therefore; Mr. Bush and his pseudo-religious proponents of bureaucratic tyranny attacked Iraq using the excuse of its leader's non-existent connection with nuclear weapons WMD and the attacks of 9/11; and yes, they hoped to convert people in the Near east away from fundamentalist Islam to Christianity.
But their main reason for going there was to steal oil and
steal power from the citizens of this country for their own pockets and to steal power from other nations for them to misuse while pretending to be elected United States types.
The proof is simple: haven't their sort stolen 85% of the wealth in this country and handed it over to corporate and bureaucratic and media supporters of their Republican-Puritan nonsense? Are they planning to give any of it back to the citizens they robbed? Are they taking any of it back from oil corporations and financial corporations who've done nothing to earn any of it Are they admitting Iraq is lost? Did they build an infrastructure in Afghanistan,
rebuild Iraq, rebuild new Orleans, move to protect Sacramento, New Orleans and the Gulf Coast from future hurricanes? Have they changed their course once in seven years except to demand more and worse ideas of the same sort that have caused a world crisis and now threaten the financial structure of the whole world?
Then I'm right. All they wanted was oil in Iraq, and pseudo-Christian dictatorship over the free world.
2007-04-16 16:27:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robert David M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
You mean war of terror?
2007-04-16 16:12:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think oil plays the major part but religion too.
2007-04-16 16:23:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
And we all know CNN has never been biased...
2007-04-16 16:21:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by RockHunter 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup it is, isn't it obvious? and yeah, we all have our opinions, you can't really say anybody's opinion is right or wrong
2007-04-16 16:15:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by rt1290 6
·
0⤊
0⤋