The more that woman talks, the more she digs her own grave. So let her babble on.
2007-04-16 08:48:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
Oh, she's ambitious, alright. I don't necessarily think it's intense enough to blind her, but I wouldn't count her out yet.
I don't see a Democratic candidate yet that I'd be willing to vote for. But if Hillary stumbles, I see Sen. Obama getting the nomination. The "Dems" seem to like those smiling, young, less experienced, hope-filled guys who campaign on the promise of making some changes. If you'll permit me to generalize, I'll say this: They know exactly where they want to get to, but don't seem to ever explain how they're going to get there. And their young, highly energized supporters just jump for joy and eat this up.
I can remember when Bill Clinton ran in 1992. EVERY other likely candidate and highly experienced Democratic politician had past failures and other negative baggage tarnishing his/her record. Clinton, however, was a relatively new guy on the national scene. He just flashed that smile, told us he was from a place called Hope (but he was really raised in Hot Springs), told us what kind of underwear he uses, put his sun glasses on while blowing his sax, and he was "in like Flint," as they say.
In fact, at the Democratic National Convention, all the old heavy weights ... Tip O'Neill, Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, etc. ... were conspicuously absent from the convention until after the nomination process was complete. I remember the news analysts making mention of this. The party wanted to give the impression ... more like an illusion ... that this was a "new" Democratic party. Yeah, sure.
I had my worries from the beginning, though. That draft dodging matter never sat well with me. Furthermore, I distinctly remember when Bill Clinton was being interviewed on 60 Minutes with Hillary at his side. As the questioning continued and one especially tough question came up, Hillary put her arm out and placed it across Bill's chest in a most conspicuous fashion to indicate that SHE wanted to answer that question. Wow, talk about strong body language ... Her reply basically was this: "Look, if you like my husband, then just vote for him; if you don't, then don't." This did not demonstrate to me that they were coming ready to serve us; it sounded more like she was coming to tell us how it's going to be, period.
Then, of course, there's her famous line about her not planning to stay home to stand by her man to bake cookies like Tammy Wynette. I wonder whether her opponents will use that line in their campaign against her.
Oh, did I get off-track a bit? Well, here's my point. Don't count her out yet, but that doesn't mean I support her. And if she stumbles, Sen. Obama is in. The Dems won't care whether he's sufficiently experienced or not, as long as his image is one of a young, smiling, ambitious, hope-filled, and change-promising candidate with a relatively clean record, they'll make him their candidate for the White House, lack of experience be damned.
Thanks for a good question.
2007-04-17 00:22:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How long did it take for president dumbass to realize america didn't want him?
Hillary deffinately doesn't trail kucinich or richardson in the polls do to name recognition alone (most don't know who kucinich or richardson even are). So that poll may be a little screwed up. Obama or Hillary is leading depending on the poll, edwards probably in a slightly distant third. I doubt anyone else even comes close to hillary in support (only because no one knows about the other people, and well, every one knows about her).
Don't underestimate Hilary, she is surprisingly popular amongst democrats, and is a very smart woman. YOU may not want her but that really doesn't matter she still has the ability to win election. Same as I don't want president dumbass and look how much difference that makes.
2007-04-16 08:52:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
properly, GW grew to become into in place of work for roughly 9 months while 9/11 got here approximately. It took him merely yet another 6 months to start a war that he LIED to congress to get investment for. It took approximately 5 years for the gasoline fees to start creeping as much as the part of lunacy. And yet another 12 months in the previous the housing industry began to disintegrate in the previous our very eyes. Our borders nonetheless are actually not secured, our embassys are being attacked, and we are being threatened by using different international locations, and Bush - whether he wanted to - nonetheless could no longer do something to counter an attack because of the fact too a lot of our troops are committed to Afghanistan and Iraq. i might take the two of the Democrat nominees over the fool in there now, or yet another Republican in to proceed what the fool has began and can't end. we are in a extensive deficit because of this war, and you're apprehensive that your taxes might desire to pass up?? they might desire to pass as much as cover THE loopy SPENDING OF THE REPUBLICAN IN place of work!! you will no longer be able to spend extra money than you herald - it extremely is referred to as bankrupcy for the final organization! Bush is working this u . s . a . top into bankrupcy, if it have been an company. The trustees may well be final the doorways and promoting off the stuff to the Saudis and chinese language! the place do you get that this u . s . a . is a good distance better below the Republicans? Please element this out, for i think of something human beings might want to correctly known. . .
2016-12-29 16:50:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mrs. Bill Clinton, is being told things, from associates that aren't being on the level with her. (Good for us ) Her noted aspect of having a Fiery Anger? Is gonna be put to the test, around Election time. Let's all just sit back and watch. Reality T V. at it's best!
2007-04-16 23:50:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nunya Bidniss 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I was in the audience the other night when someone was speaking about the contenders for the presidency. When he picture was shown on a screen, there was a low "hissing" sound in the crowd. The speaker smiled and said, "Hmm, something wrong with the heating system?"
2007-04-17 00:09:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by I am Sunshine 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
When "We the people demand Congress abolish the16th amendment, get rid of the IRS, overturn the federal reserve act and the government itself print its own money backed by gold and silver interest free, thus getting rid of the federal reserve, kick the UN out of the United States as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and cut absolutely all monetary as well as intellectual funding to both completely. i think she'll get the message that we just gave her a ticket to go straight to he11.
2007-04-16 12:16:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope she's blind to it . But it probably won't matter.. . . . . Neither Hillary nor Obama are electable . Not because I don't like them , but because Hillary has the highest " I will never vote for her " rating in history , and Obama is too wishy washy and inexperienced . People may claim to like him now, but just wait until they have to decide who's gonna protect us.. . Smile. . . he has about a 'Zero Rating' on that !!
BTW, thanks for B/A , but you said you sent an email... . well I never got it .
2007-04-16 23:05:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You should really read up on the history of American politics. There are plenty of past candidate who went from front runners in the early going to also rans by the time the nominating convention was over.
My point is it's way too early to count anyone out.
2007-04-16 08:48:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
When another political party candidate has been chosen instead then she will stop spending money on campaigning possibly. But then she may try to contest the decision somehow also. One can hope that she just takes the decision gracefully but don't bet on it either. Her ambition , or greed may push her to not just let the better man peacefully run for office then initially. Time will tell to see how that goes.
2007-04-16 08:49:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hillary is nothing more than a socialist. She doesn't have what it takes to be president...Character. She would be a total disgrace to the office of the president just like here husband was.
2007-04-16 08:48:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋