English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On terror? Do you think this is what his scam is? To use terrorism as a ticket to invade any country he wants?

2007-04-16 08:12:22 · 39 answers · asked by Ugly Betty 3 in Politics & Government Politics

39 answers

No. You should read Popular Mechanics. Also, you should read The Man Who Warned America by Murray Weiss. Then you are a pro terrorist.

2007-04-16 08:24:41 · answer #1 · answered by c1523456 6 · 4 2

God, I almost wish i was stupid enough to believe you... seriously, if this crap was true, man we would have invaded Venezula, Iran, probably gearing up to go to war with Canada. Alaska and Texas has been acting a little beligerent, better mobilize! If it were about Bush wanting to invade a country, we would have gone to war with Saudi Arabia ALONG time ago! And don't even get me started on "Loose Change," if half that crap is true, then that stupid, S.O.B. Avery and his entire family would be dead. The government has the capability to kill 3,000 Americans with ease, but cant shut some zit-faced kid up?
The next poll you should have is "How stupid are you?"

2007-04-16 08:43:52 · answer #2 · answered by m 4 · 4 1

the better suggestion is that they were gearing up to do some things and used this coincidence as an excuse to use full military force rather than use smaller quieter actions.

The CIA was already funding a revolution in Afgahnistan before 911, that's why the US was attacked. They have been trying to put a pipeline across Afgahnistan. for a long time. The US grew frustrated dealing with individual warlords who always demand more money or they'll break your pipe.

Perhaps in the end it's all for a hollow piece of metal.

2007-04-16 08:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

For the 1,500,001 time NO! Really, it's a scam to get young heads full of nothing to turn to communism, natureism, crazyism, smoke dope, get drunk, and hey, it's the governments fault!

Stand up for yourself, don't fall for groupspeak. Check facts. Be curious. Don't just rely on what someone tells you. Question everything!

If they can convince you that our own President would attack or promote an attack on his own country, then the crazies win! Rational thought goes away, and you're now part of the anti US government cabal.

2007-04-16 08:37:44 · answer #4 · answered by smatthies65 4 · 3 1

And you wonder why people say mean things about you. I thought you were a reformed conspiracy theorist.

Just one simple question: How can Bush be the biggest moron to ever sit in the White House, but somehow be the mastermind of 9/11? Doesn't that sound a bit contadictory. Of course if he was playing dumb, that would be proof of how smart he really is don't ya think?

2007-04-16 08:18:35 · answer #5 · answered by evil_paul 4 · 4 2

Um, no, but maybe Clinton did, after all he was in office for the first WTC attack, attacks on US embassies, and on the USS Cole.
No the ones behind it were the Islamic (though not really religous just using it as a front) radical terrorist who used 9/11 as a way to bully the US people and our government into their way of thinking.

2007-04-16 09:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by rz1971 6 · 1 1

i think of a brilliant form of the 'sickening cliches' might desire to do with the era wherein the action pictures ensue; in the process the 1st and 2d international Wars, america of a had an quite good, pretty much unanimous feeling of patriotism and help for his or her infantrymen, pitching in the place they might. as quickly as we seem lower back on the 1940's, that's the heroic thoughts of brotherhood and perseverance we frequently hear approximately. whilst the script for Peal Harbor might have been cliche and predictable, super video clips like Saving inner maximum Ryan carry an identical patriotic undertone to the story. in case you seem at action pictures like Platoon, or Born of the Fourth of July, working example, the tone of the story is plenty distinctive, whilst individuals have been placing out to comprehend the grotesque factor of conflict and protested it. video clips set in cutting-edge situations with regard to the present day conflict in Iraq look incorporate an identical message.

2016-10-03 02:05:58 · answer #7 · answered by husted 4 · 0 0

You are all wrong!! It was Lex Luther and the Legion of Doom!! Solomon Grundy destroyed Tower 1, Giganta pushed over Tower 2 and Gorilla Grod took out 7.

2007-04-16 08:26:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

well i say not just Bush but our entire goverment and its been done in the past they did in Pearl Harbor when there were 7 warning signs and in 1993 bombing. Also the American people are to scared to admit that there government would do such a thing where as in other countries the citizens know if there goverment were behind. thats why i think that people are saying no is b/c we cant accept the fact our goverment would do that to its people

2007-04-16 08:21:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Still asking the stupid questions I see and still going by several different names. At least you're diverse, you've been a woman named Nancy, a surfer dude, an English guy named Skip, a Hippie, a Spanish duded named Vato and of course Ugly Betty. You need to be a black woman next.

2007-04-16 08:28:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Fabricating 9/11? How did he do that? It happened...maybe not as reported, but it happened. It was not a fabrication. Now the question is, did Bush use the emotions associated with 9/11 to his advantage? I'd bet he did.

2007-04-16 08:18:53 · answer #11 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers