was an inside job, and you believe global warming than what about this:
The vast majority of experts (physicists, structual engineers etc..) dont believe your conspiracy about 9-11 and only a small number of them do believe there was a conspiracy in the 9-11 attacks. Yet you believe the minority.
Global Warming: A lot of scientists agree Global Warming is real and that we are causing it. A small number of scientists don't agree with that (actually its around 1/4). Yet in this case you believe the majority.
What is it with you libs and your lack of consistancy when it comes to who you believe, one second you believe the majority, one second yuo beleive with the minority. This is due to the fact that you just cite the research of whoever agrees with you and your political agenda.
Can ANYONE on here prove this wrong?
2007-04-16
07:40:22
·
16 answers
·
asked by
libh8r13f
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
"But that doesn't mean you shouldn't cite your source for your statistics. "
Lol, I think this subejct has been beaten to death here, a quick search on Y!A will show sources from both sides of the argument. We're all familiar with the facts here.
2007-04-16
07:52:10 ·
update #1
"Now explain why you believe the majority in the first case and the minority in the second. "
Actually I believe the majority in both cases. I understand there is global warming but exactly how devistating its going to be is still very debatable, we're talking sea levels risnig 20 inches all the way to 30 feet. I dont believe 30 feet, and neither do most scientists.
2007-04-16
07:53:27 ·
update #2
"The people that keep asking the questions about the "9/11 conspiracy", what makes you so sure that they are all liberals?"
-Both on Y!A and on the streets,w ehn I debate 9-11 with a conspiracy theorist they identify them as liberals. They just dont trust the government at all and would rather upt together a million little technicalities and argue how the obviosue reason for 9-11 is not true.
2007-04-16
07:56:00 ·
update #3
If anyone believes that, they'll believe anything.
2007-04-17 02:07:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The same mass generalization can be used to paint conservatives.
Why do you believe with the Majority on 9/11 but side with the minority on global warming?
I am a liberal and I don't believe in the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 and I kind of believe the global warming stuff.
2007-04-16 07:52:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by MI 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Don Imus got fired not because of nappy head hoes statement, but because he was about to go public on 911.
He's a conservative and would have been more of a threat than Rosie coming out on 9/11.
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/13-04-2007/89728-Don_Imus-0
You haven't been paying attention to the "vast majority of scientists physicists and demo experts that said there is no way those buildings could have been brought down without explosives. Plus all the eye witnesses repoted hearing explosives going off all over the buildings.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1319140198279354134&q=bombs+911
Fortunately the truth about 9/11 is not conspiracy anymore and it in definitely not just a liberal issue. Plenty of people believe that explosives brought down the towers. All you have to do is connect the dots.
2007-04-16 09:24:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're barking mad. Very few liberals (emphasis on the *very*) I know think anything like that.
And again, the vast majority of liberals (and most everyone else) I know couldn't give a fluff how many scientists agree with anthropogenic global warming theory. If the science behind it is sound the theory is good, and we don't need any scientists to point this out to us. Most people accept the theory purely on a scientific basis.
So since you made three sweeping generalizations, none of which have even the tiniest bit of evidence supporting them, you fail. At life.
2007-04-16 08:02:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by SomeGuy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree to an extent, because all the liberals will say the same about us only in reverse, the point I would make is that they ALWAYS have to point out when they are with the majority never mention the fact when they are in the minority. All we here from them is how the majority don't agree with the war however there was not a mention of polls when 65% of the people were for the war. Every other second some liberal is saying how the majority disproves of Bush not a peep when his approve rating was higher.
2007-04-16 07:50:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by ReedRothchild 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes I can. I am a liberal, and don't believe the 9/11 conspiracy nuts. I believe the majority in both cases. Now explain why you believe the majority in the first case and the minority in the second.
2007-04-16 07:45:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
As neither a republican or a democrat... I believe what makes common sense.
I am very consistent in my beliefs.
Common sense is what I use in deciding anything. And I do not bother arguing with fools who come in and call me a fool just by assumption.
There are just too many holes in the 911 stories to NOT wonder about the truth. There are too many firemen and police and viewers from 911 who have made very telling statements about what they heard and saw.
But, why bother arguing with you? You already know that I am inconsistent and therefore confused. LOL.
It is amazing how thick those who deny are.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82iQeHCabJU
Problem, Reaction, Solution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8eP8LTUlvI
Unhidden Agendas. Wake Up! Vol. 1
These guys are awesome. All their vids are done to great music and they get the point across.
2007-04-16 08:03:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't get where you are coming from. Do you just define anybody that disagrees with you as "liberal"? I don't know how you can define anybody with one word, unless you just don't know but a few words. Try getting a little education, and maybe even a little life experience before going off on rants about people you don't know, or know anything about. Most of your conspiracy theory nuts (any conspiracy theory, just pick one) don't even know what liberal or conservative is. They just heard their daddy, or a favorite teacher, or favorite hate radio talker call somebody that and use it for whatever ticks them off this time.
2007-04-16 08:01:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Erwin B 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Who has more to gain by making liberals look like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists? The people that keep asking the questions about the "9/11 conspiracy", what makes you so sure that they are all liberals?
If you wanted to make liberals look like a bunch of nutcases, how would you go about it? you really have no idea what is motivating the people that ask these questions
2007-04-16 07:47:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't believe global warming is man-made, nor do I believe that the conspiracy theory has any merit.
But that doesn't mean you shouldn't cite your source for your statistics.
2007-04-16 07:44:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by replicant21 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
uhhhh you need to up your dosage of medication. I am about as liberal as they come and I agree with you on the global warming it is real and it is happening now. As for 911 where the hell did you get that from???? Of course it happened and of course it was a conspiracy from Al-keada... Duh.
2007-04-16 07:49:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by ewtaylor2001 5
·
3⤊
1⤋