2007-04-16 06:16:19 · 8 answers · asked by ? 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
"Nature has simply created a different ridge pattern for every finger. No two persons can have identical fingerprints. The chances that two people might have the same ridge pattern on even one finger, are one in twenty-four million."
2007-04-16 07:30:47 · answer #1 · answered by Niotulove 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they weren't, how can police identify perps just by running their fingerprints through a system database?
(Everbody at birth gets printed, hands and feet. This way, if a baby gets stolen, it wil be easier to find. If there were two identical baby prints, the hospitals would know. They share that database. You have no point ME)
Not even TWINS share the same fingerprints! And they would be the ones to have identical fingerprints, don't you think?
2007-04-16 13:18:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We each have identical fingerprint. The forensic investigator introduces a specialized ink to somewhat record it and analyze the surface of the curves formed by ridges of the fingertip.
2007-04-16 13:23:55 · answer #3 · answered by Ms. Buckyball 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The swirls and patterns are basically the same for most individuals, but the ridges on the swirls are different. It's like DNA, the strand, the sequences are basically the same, but the entire strand is different for everyone.
2007-04-19 23:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by andrea c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
U prove that they are not. In all our experience we have got it to a point that the computer can check them and the computer checks millions.
2007-04-16 16:46:15 · answer #5 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
even if there are two people w/ exact same prints. What are the odds of them commiting the same crime.
2007-04-16 13:19:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Got you , you did it
there you go proof!
2007-04-16 13:18:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prove they are not. :)
2007-04-16 13:18:31 · answer #8 · answered by Skyhawk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋