English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

any proof scientifically that they existed????

2007-04-16 04:03:15 · 9 answers · asked by Covenanted 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

9 answers

Yes, they are called dinosaurs nowadays. And they never breathed fire.

2007-04-16 04:07:03 · answer #1 · answered by catarthur 6 · 0 2

yes.

well when you ask a question like I say why wouldn't they exist?

now there was a big lizard that lived a long time ago but after the dinosaurs that was said to be in Australia. this lizard killed allot of early people but in a movie on animal "LOST into the past' or something like that it said that "we" used fire to kill them and set fire to the bush. now other tribes might have had lizards ruining or maby have killed people wile trying to escape the fire and some who saw that linked the fire with the animal.

http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/histo...

IF THEY EXISTED

Now shy might they not exist? they would have lived a long time ago and were killed by the KT event. but the water dragon would have lived.
http://animal.discovery.com/convergence/...
now they could have moved on land as said in the site and humans would haved not liked that much. there would have been fight and nobody lived to tell the story so dragons went into myth and legend. sad. but the water dragon could be living at the bottom of the ocean and we have just not found them, there fossils could been lost to Earth's platal movements, or we just have not found them.

keep this all in mind and if you want to talk about e-mail me.

so having said all that yes I believe dragons once lived.

the hard thing about dragons is that is some evendence that they did exsist and that they did no so we don't know yet.

one more thing...komodo dragons are monitor lizerds now they may resimble dragons and that could be one of the stories that evalved into dragons but konodo dragons are MONITOR LIZERDS

Source(s):
animal planet, my nolage of dragons, and some leagends that I study

2007-04-17 21:54:40 · answer #2 · answered by DRAGON 5 · 0 0

There is proof that they could have existed, scientifically validated explanations for fire-breath and all of that. But no real proof that they ever existed other than circumstantial evidence, like existing in every culture in disparate areas of the globe with no communication with each-other. They'd have to eat a lot of platinum to breathe fire though, hard to see where such creatures could find deposits of that much platinum.

2007-04-16 11:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Of course they do. Komodo Dragons live on islands off East Asia. Big lizards really, no fire-breathing (obviously), have been known to eat people though.

2007-04-16 11:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by Ian I 4 · 0 1

Most people are unaware that the word “dinosaur” was not coined until the 1840s by Sir. Richard Owen. So, if these creatures lived alongside humans prior to that time, they were not called dinosaurs. So what were they called? Dragons. Most cultures throughout the world possess ancient stories about dragons and sea monsters that closely resemble what we today would call dinosaurs. Dragon stories have been handed down for generations in most civilizations.

No doubt many of these stories have been exaggerated through the years, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t have their original basis in fact. I believe many of the dragon legends are simply distorted versions of dinosaur encounters. As Paul Taylor has said, “Most of the dragon legends are full of exaggeration, magic and marvelous deeds. But this is not true of all of them. Many stories seem rather believable.” It is true that many of them are mythical or legendary but it is also true that most legends are based on some truth. It cannot be an accident that so many separate peoples of the world tell such stories.

The stories of Gilgamesh, Beowulf, and Saint George killing dragons are likely to have been based on at least some fact. These were real men in history.

As you know, dragons are prominent on Chinese pottery, embroidery, carvings, etc. It’s interesting that the twelve signs of the Chinese zodiac are all animals—eleven of which are still alive today, but one is the dragon. It doesn’t seem logical that the ancient Chinese, when constructing their zodiac, would include one mythical animal with eleven real animals.

In 1271, Marco Polo (the Italian explorer) reported that on special occasions in China the royal chariot was pulled by dragons. Marco Polo also said that he saw long reptiles in Asia called Lindworms that could easily ran as fast as a horse.

In 1611, we can see that the emperor appointed the post of “Royal Dragon Feeder” which doesn’t make sense if there were no dragons to feed. We also find Ancient Chinese books telling of people using dragon eggs, blood, bones and other parts for medicine.

John of Damascus (an Arab monk in the 8th century) wrote against some of the wild and mythical claims about dragons and said, “I am not telling you, after all, that there are no dragons; dragons exist but they are serpents [reptiles] borne of other serpents. When just born and young, they are small; but when they grow up and mature, they become big and fat so that they exceed the other serpents in length and size. It is said they grow up more than thirty cubits [45 feet]; as for their thickness, they become as thick as a huge log.”

There is a well-known science book from the 16th century by a Swiss naturalist and medical doctor named Conrad Gesner called Historia Animalium. The book claims that dragons were still not extinct in the 1500's, but were extremely rare and relatively small by then.

After Alexander the Great invaded India (356-323 B.C.) he brought back reports of great hissing reptiles the Indians kept in caves. There was one that really frightened his army and was estimated by them to be over 100 feet long.

And then there’s all the stories of giant sea serpents and sea monsters. As Dr. Mace Baker said, “For more than a thousand years ancient and medieval mariners often returned from their voyages with frightening tales of encounters with, or sightings of, large and dangerous sea monsters.”

There are hundreds of these types of legends. Evolutionists just say that it’s coincidence that many of them sound like dinosaurs. World Book Encyclopedia says: “The dragons of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man was supposed to have appeared on earth.”

What about fire-breathing dragons (since people keep bringing that up)? In Job 41 (Bible), the "Leviathan" is described (Isaiah 27:1 calls it the dragon in the sea.) The margin of the NIV says, “Possibly the crocodile.” But the description doesn’t fit any animal alive today. Besides, man has never had a problem catching crocodiles, even primitive tribes, but it says in Job 41 that Leviathan couldn’t be caught.

Some think this was just a mythical creature since it speaks of it breathing fire. And yes, Job is a poetic book and those could just be poetic descriptions. But not necessarily. Impossible you say? What about the electric eel that can produce enough electricity to stun a horse? If the electric eel was extinct and all we could find were its fossils, would we be able to know that it could generate electricity? Nope. What about the firefly and anglerfish that can produce light? What about the bombardier beetle that can fire a boiling mixture of chemicals at its enemies that is 212 degrees Fahrenheit?

Why couldn’t there have been certain water-living reptiles that were capable of expelling hot gaseous fumes that could ignite? Most animals produce methane anyway, which is a flammable gas. Stories of fire-breathing dragons have circulated for thousands of years in many different cultures.

Also, keep in mind that Leviathan was included along with real creatures that Job knew about. Read Job sometime (the "behemoth" in Job 40 sounds like a sauropod dinosaur).

2007-04-17 17:20:52 · answer #5 · answered by Questioner 7 · 1 0

No. No fossils and no reason to believe the accounts.

2007-04-16 11:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by eri 7 · 1 0

no... not of u consider dinosaures, but they didnt breath fire

2007-04-16 11:49:17 · answer #7 · answered by absentmindednik 3 · 0 0

NO ...they're all mythical.

2007-04-16 11:08:37 · answer #8 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 0

lol no way

2007-04-16 11:06:38 · answer #9 · answered by mada 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers