No, it hasn't. Please cite source for that. The Sun is 15 million degrees in the core. That would be a huge increase.
I really hope you don't mean biological evolution. I really hope you mean stellar evolution. Even then, though, the Sun will be pretty stable for the next 5 billion years.
No, we aren't the cause of anything that happens to the Sun. We cannot influence the Sun, we don't have anywhere near the technology to do that. The Sun is in control.
So, you're saying that if the Sun is somehow causing global warming (I'm assuming that's where you're going with this), then we don't have to do anything about it? Guess what - no matter how it was caused, it will kill us either way if we don't do anything.
2007-04-16 03:43:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Sun surface temperature is about 10000 F. There are storms (Sunspots) in the surface that are about 7000 F. The amount of Sunspots has a cycle of eleven years. Every 11 years the number of Sunspots increases so the temperature decreases.
A change of 0.05 degrees will not make any difference. The Sun's temperature and the cycle of Sunspots are consequence of no planet.
2007-04-16 10:48:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We cannot have any influence on the behaviour of the sun. Not a chance, we're totally insignificant little dots crawling about on the surface of one of the smaller planets.
The sun regularly goes through eleven-year cycles and we happen to be right at the end of one of those cycles now. If you watch an entire cycle speeded up, you will see a dramatic increase in sun-spot activity, culminating in the surface of the sun appearing to boil it of course then calms down before the cycle begins again.
At the height of the cycle, we can expect temperatures to rise, electronic equipment to malfunction which interfers with global communications.
It caused a Canadian substation to almost explode at the end of the last cycle, a lot of Canucks were left without power for a while.
2007-04-18 02:17:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by elflaeda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In order for the Sun to have a noticeable temperature increase, it must be much much more than 0.05 degrees. The Sun's surface, the photosphere, is about 5000 degrees Celsius, while the centre of the Sun burns at a temperature of more than 10 million degrees Celsius!
Do you really think that 0.05 degrees is going to be a noticeable difference?
2007-04-19 09:28:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tenebra98 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see how you can put the increase of the Suns temperature down to us?
Our Earth has little, or basically no effect on the thermonuclear fusion reactions that take place at the core.
How do you think we can affect the Suns temperature?
2007-04-16 03:35:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by wil_hopcyn 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
What are your sources for this? Earth's temperature higher about one degree over the century. We did no longer have, and nevertheless haven't got, the flexibility to degree Mars' temperature that appropriately. And, Mars' environment is so skinny it does no longer play a position in greenhouse consequences. you won't be able to make a evaluation. Particulate count number does no longer capture warmth. It does reason clouds to type, which blocks sunlight. it really is said as the Albedo result, and this frequently cools the Earth.
2016-12-04 03:09:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are many good websites that discuss surface temperature of the Sun. And yes, it changes by several -million- degrees on a fairly cyclic basis.
HTH
Doug
2007-04-16 03:36:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing to do with earth, this even has. Only the natural evolution of the stars it is. It's the way it's meant to be
2007-04-16 03:39:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by pro_gustavo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read here .. it's going up .05% per decade.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html
2007-04-16 03:53:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋