only people like Hegel can answer this difficult question.
2007-04-16 22:00:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by nightingale 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A state may be a perceived order in a unity. More than one order may be perceived in that same unity but not all perceived orders are a state for that unity. Some perceived orders are the unities identity and some orders may be the state or condition that is differentiated in that unities history, i.e. the identification of change, or change that is transformation in that unity. Transitional states may be a transition from an ordered unity to an non-absolute chaos for that unity or a reestablishment for an non-absolute order (imperfect).
2007-04-16 15:59:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This one is difficult.
First, The state of the unity is probably better defined as characteristic, than ordered.
When unity takes a state it takes it characteristically, within characteristics is order, not all characteristics are ordinate and order is parameterised over degrees of unity so a state of unity is in the order parameterised over degrees of the unity.
Consider - form, as a state of unity, the parameters of form are characteristics of a state of unity. Form has order through those characteristics of unity which are parameters. The state, which is form, is in the parameterised order over degrees of the unity.
_The_ state of unity is all degrees of the unity, and in my contemplation I assume a distance quotient in degrees of unity, somewhat like resonant frequencies, less oscillatory energy gathers where frequencies are incompatible. So some characteristics over a set term of degrees will gather greater resonance than others because they are more consistent with localised frequency. So I say x local degrees of unity are a state of unity in the order of a, b and c parameters of characteristics greater than or equal to tangible. Scope has limits that unity does not.
sorry to have changed this answer so many times.
2007-04-16 03:37:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Monita C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
interesting , why do you love the word " unity" so much.
Are you building another united states? You look like a queen.
my unlearned opinion is
before the order , there must be consensus among people who want to be united ,
so the state of the unity comes from the consensus .
good luck your majesty .
2007-04-16 03:51:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you hit upon a candidate that does greater than a number of of here: defines them self as a modern-day, helps unfastened commerce agreements, advocates no borders, helps mutli-national companies (particular pastime communities), helps amnesty for extraterrestrial beings that arrive illegally or over stay their visas, that help l. a. Raza, that help the internal maximum Federal Reserve financial institution to alter housing bail-outs, that helps the WTO, that believes Al Gore's alarmist worldwide warming propaganda, that subscribes to the strategies of The U.N. value on worldwide Governance. The expert worldwide value working in the direction of implementation of the worldwide government during the recent MILLENNIUM, you recognize you have a globalist candidate that would not have faith interior the sovereignty of countries and desires an elitist one worldwide financial fund and government. Hillary defines herself, not as a liberal, yet as a modern-day. all the applicants have placed themselves as in help of amnesty for those illegally interior the U. S.. it truly is 2, i'll permit you examine something. in case you examine the candidate's web content you have the flexibility to confirm with which strategies they align themselves.
2016-12-20 16:09:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Holy shitttttttttt who cares.
Don't yoou have other things to think about?
what is up wtih you and unity? damnnnnnnnnn
2007-04-16 17:50:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The disorder would have to be included as the state as well.
2007-04-16 09:24:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My opinion is no.
2007-04-16 03:19:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋