Why is there not a single picture of the jet that slammed into the pentagon?

Question

Washington DC probably has more cameras than any other city in the world. Somehow, there is not 1 picture or Video of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. The only pic I have seen is from a gatehouse outside the Pentagon, and there is no way to tell what it was. ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER CAMERAS AT THE PENTAGON OR ELSEWHERE THAT CAPTURED THIS JET FLYING INTO DC?

Answer 1

go on to loosechange.com ....there u will b suprised with the real facts...dey dont even thihnk it was a plane that crashed into the penragon....a plane crashes into a building and all d windows remain intact......ahem...ya right!!! hope it helps..

Answer 2

An excellent question?! For those who say that the five stills taken from the pentagon gate camera showing an aircraft, specifically a 757 hitting the Pentagon, should get their heads examined. At best what is shown is an explosion. Anything to the contrary is pure speculation and would require a proper investigation pertaining to the impact, debris field, camera[s], and eye-witness testimony. None of this has been done containing the evidence at hand. One thing for sure, what hit the Pentagon was not flight 77! And, anyone who says otherwise, hasn't taken the time to do the research and are basing their opinion on what is being spoon fed to them by the established media, period.
For starters, the Pentagon is one of the most heavily surveilled sites on this planet, yet the public is only provided with 5 pictures of dubious quality that shows a wrong date on the pictures themselves? I guess if these pictures were to be submitted in a court of law, there would be some consternation as to who would stick their necks out and represent fabricated evidence? If you are not already aware that there were other cameras in the area as well; What about the cameras on the Pentagon itself? No mention of this fact whatsoever. What about the department of highways camera that would have caught something? What about the Citgo gas station camera that had a perfect view of the Impact or explosion area? The FBI confiscated the video-tape hours after the event. What about the Sheraton Hotel camera? Again confiscated. Now I ask you, is there not something wrong with this picture?

Answer 3

Sorry i don't have time to click on your links however the question nonetheless remains. the secure practices cameras on the Pentagon might have picked this up, yet all secure practices digicam tapes have been confiscated, is what I study. I did see this one that confirmed some form of blur yet lower back, the impact crater grew to become right into a hollow that confirmed no signs and indicators of wings having struck the Pentagon wall. possibly no secure practices digicam grew to become into on the properly suited perspective to p.c.. this up, yet then why no assertion testifying to this? and that i've got heard no achievable clarification of ways a loser/adverse performer on a flight simulator might desire to placed a extensive jet right into a steep dive and point off purely some yards above the floor at over 4 hundred mph to attain one in all those bullseye while pro veteran pilots admit they won't have executed that. the two the ability of Allah isn't any trifle or the terrorist pilot lucked out huge time. the component is, given the outcomes, it form of feels they have been all particularly rattling useful they might hit their targets. apart from that group mutiny that downed the fourth hijacked airliner. I make no conclusions apart from the nagging theory there is extra to all of this than all of us understand.

Answer 4

Here's a video from 9/11 showing a news report with the plane approaching the Pentagon. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/barak_9-11.wmv

There were TONS of eyewitness accounts from civilians all over the place.

Remember - Barbara Olsen was on the plane - flight 77 - that hit the Pentagon. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/pentagon.olson/

Answer 5

You conspiracy theorists make me laugh. Bill Clinton couldn't keep a b***job quiet, yet you think the government and the media are in cahoots to cover up an event like this? Tell me--what shutter speed and fstop would you use to photograph something traveling at 500 mph? And how is invading Afghanistan and Iraq protecting Muslims? Furthermore, if one of your loved ones had jumped to his or her death from the WTC, how many times would you like to see it broadcast on the evening news? I have seen quite enough. You people need to grow up and get jobs. Hobbies. Anything to occupy your little minds. Laughable!

Answer 6

The media doesn't want too much anger stirred up against our enemy. They want to protect Muslims. This is also why people are rarely shown falling from the towers, and not one body has been shown being removed from Ground Zero.

It's also why the don't cover animal abuse in China. They want people to believe that Americans are evil. It's social engineering within the liberal media.

Answer 7

Not at all. The government quickly went around and confiscated ALL the pictures from any cameras that would have taken a picture. The government has NOT released any other pictures other than the one you saw.

They claim national security. I claim national secrecy.

Answer 8

Good lord! There was pictures of the plane and a multitude of evidence that it WAS a plane.
What are you trying to say??????
Another conspiricy theory? Oh, my god!

Answer 9

The more you dig the curiouser the whole thing gets.

Answer 10

hope you have a hi speed connect watch this movie