English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Yes. South Africa has been consistent in one thing - inconsistency. Our bowling attack is too one dimensional and in the match against New Zealand we also appeared ill prepared to face a bowling lineup which was not a pure pace attack. We use to have the ability to play spin very well but no longer. The New Zealand match more than any other showed up our weakness on the bowling front. Robin Petersen's part time spin does not count as a varying line-up. NZ's captain could call on an attack which included Bond's pace, Mcmillans odd dibbly dobblers, Franklin's left arm swing, Patel's off spin, Vettori's left arm spin and Styris's slow medium pace.

While England may not have a bowling line-up of such depth, it is certainly more varied than South Africa's. If Kevin Pietersen gets in on the act South Africa are out. His average against South Africa is in the region of 151.00 whereas against any other country his average is 53 and a bit. He has a history of playing his best against us and if he's not dismissed early he could lead a charge along with Flintoff that would demolish us.

Yes, based on South Africa's on again-off again performance in this World Cup, I would be surprised if we won.

2007-04-16 03:34:20 · answer #1 · answered by Ni Ten Ichi Ryu 4 · 1 0

Yes if we don't watch Petersen, Flintoff and Colliwood.
Those 3 are the problem lets hope Pollock and Ntini perform because if those two do badly then its over for us.
By the way why was Langervelt not playing on Saturday he is our leading wicket take in the world cup so lets hope he bowls against England.
AB Deviliers that guy needs to have little more self confidence and he will win us the world cup , the thing is he just looks too nervse when the bowler comes charging down the wicket, that guy has the potential to be better then Lara and Suchen just more motivation thats all.

2007-04-16 03:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The way south africa played against new zealand anything is possible. I think south africa should feel lucky if they make the semi's

2007-04-16 17:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by SAgirl 5 · 1 0

Absolutely not, the boys will thrash England! Just you see, South Africa have a great team and they will put their all into tomorrows game.
Come on boys! They will be going home, with the trophy!

2007-04-16 12:28:33 · answer #4 · answered by rsaleo88 1 · 0 0

Nothing is impossible but i sure hope South Africa wins

2007-04-16 01:11:46 · answer #5 · answered by cheri 7 · 0 0

Hello there this is Ana just come across a site during the India-west indies and India srilanka although they have a small score card but there audio was fantastic and was really successfully enjoyed by me the site was http://www.action8cricket.com
if you all think i delivered best then enjoy.

2007-04-17 00:59:34 · answer #6 · answered by Ana 3 · 0 0

Oooooooooooooooh yes - they had better pull their socks up - they have been playing some shoddy second class matches and they could easily find themselves out.

The irony is that Peterson is playing for England and not SA, why is that?

2007-04-16 01:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by london.oval 5 · 1 0

For the love of myself, I am not going to watch the game. My heart will stop to beat, and I still want to live. Getting the score later will be better for me.

2007-04-16 21:12:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

PORGIE,IT MAKES NO BLOODY DIFFERANCE,WERE NOT CUP MATERIAL ANY LONGER.LOSING TO GUYS LIKE BANGO IS APPALLING.IF THEY CHOKED ON KIWI ,THEN ENGLAND SHOULD THRASH THE LADS.IF BY SOME MIRACLE THEY COME THROUGH OUR GLORY WILL AGAIN END WITH EGG HEAVILY SMEARED ON OUR FACES.RATHER THEM STOP US SUFFERING FUTHER DISGRACE.DISSAPOINTED SA SUPPORTER.

2007-04-16 05:21:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes if flintoff and peterson play well we can and the man bell who would have thought it a few years ago bell he was usless. but his on form now. go boys get the sa. and bring us home the wcup. t

2007-04-16 02:16:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers