I know this sound inappropriate, needless and silly but take it seriously. In my opinion, there's nothing different between, Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher, Gordon Brown and Michael Hesseltine.
2007-04-15 22:33:53 · 8 answers · asked by Micheal 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The only thing that separates Blair from thatcher is Blair's average interest rate is 10% lower, and as for Brown and Hesseltine, 1 has brains and the other is a Tory.
2007-04-16 09:24:23 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Labour are seemingly made up of different groups of people - Backbencher Rebels, Blairites etc.
The Blairites seem to be in power at the moment, and they seem to be focussed on something (what it is I don't know, but it doesn't seem particularly wholesome).
The Tories seem to be focussed simply on defeating Labour and have no agenda for the UK at all, and the Liberal Democrats never had an agenda in the first place or so it seems to me.
Without John Prescott the Labour Party would be the same as it is now, just one less dumbass in the government that's all.
2007-04-16 00:25:15 · answer #2 · answered by cragoogle 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does any political party want John Prescott, hes a foul mouthed bigoted bully and does nothing to enhance British politics. Is labour more Tory without him, well are new labour right or left or just 2 faced.
2007-04-15 22:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Royston 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There has been a lot of convergence in recent years, with the two main parties trying to out-Tory each other. Even Prescott sounds horribly right-wing these days.
To answer your question, Labour are too Tory full stop!
2007-04-16 00:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by Archangel Gabriel 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wager he became into egg-static while he became into made a lord, I wager he will punch above his weight while he gets into the HoL. Its unhappy how potential, in spite of if its in ordinary terms fleeting and illusory can corrupt ones upbringing innovations,,, lesson for us all there, in case you have or have confidence in long status innovations. i ought to alter right into a billionaire, the richest and maximum powerfully guy in the international (fuking-ell), yet i might nevertheless be and proud to be stated as working type (yippee),,, this is in all danger why i'm no longer. surely of path i'm basically some time-honored dumb working type donkey who has all of it on understanding his ar@s from his elbow, i've got continually understand-it and that i will continually would be it. It became into human beings like me who for generations of Labour voters depended on and voted for, election after election for individuals like John Prescott,,, and that they ain't there no-extra, the Prescott's have all yet have been given,,, regrettably. And this has no longer precisely opened a door, no longer yet, even though it has unlocked it,,, you mark my words.
2016-10-22 07:19:01 · answer #5 · answered by juart 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact are that Labour are all Tory rhetoric without any Tory substance - like Brown's tax 'giveaway' and then his tax 'takeitallback'.
2007-04-15 22:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Talking of John Prescott...Where is he these days..??
I am just wondering cos he dont seem to be doing a lot for his highly inflated ( taxpayers) wages and pension.
I was going to write 'Pay'...but to be paid...you have to work.
2007-04-21 03:03:07 · answer #7 · answered by knowitall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Margaret Thatcher was your finest leader aside from Churchill in the 20th Century
It's sad really, how far you once-proud Brits have fallen
2007-04-15 22:37:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋