yes you are right in saying a state is the order in which the united are in unity.
2007-04-16 22:01:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by nightingale 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A state may be a perceived order in a unity. More than one order may be perceived in that same unity but not all perceived orders are a state for that unity. Some perceived orders are the unities identity and some orders may be the state or condition that is differentiated in that unites history, i.e. the identification of change, or change that is transformation in that unity. Transitional states may be a transition from an ordered unity to an non-absolute chaos for that unity or a reestablishment for an non-absolute order (imperfect).
2007-04-16 15:55:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is better I think given as:
A state is in the order which the united are in unity.
Duality is a parameter of form, thus a state cannot be order it will always be fluctuating, rather it is in the order, an order which is parameterised over degrees of unity.
@michael: I understand this as being a deep thought about the nature of existence and the possibilities of such thought lending themselves to science. I feel these are important philosophical explorations, and I don't think anyone is trying to be abstruse here, on the contrary the object of the language is to cut to the simplest explanation.
2007-04-15 20:07:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Monita C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The state of unity is also determined by the respective states of the parts apart from the order in which they are united.
2007-04-15 19:58:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Again my friend you are wording things that don't come across very logical in English.
And your obcession with parts and unity......very perplexing
The question isn't put together well.
A state.......you don't say how this word is used. It has a few meanings. "A state is the order" huh? " "inwhich the united are in unity???" What?
I can try to answer. That which is united has no order. If you want to define what state order is in you need to ask a more specific question.
2007-04-15 21:13:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by clcalifornia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Again...........WHAT?
I wish you could give us your definations of order, unity, united, parts of a whole and all the other words you use there that don't always make senes.
I will try to understand and answer...........we are in a state of being one with someone else if we have chosen to be unified with them.
2007-04-15 22:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
so, who is united in a state of unrest?
or the state of depression?
and what about the state of virginia at the outset of the american civil war? No unity there! the state split in two! Virginia and West Virginia.
2007-04-15 20:04:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by athorgarak 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are all of your questions about unity? Are you fascinated by the concept of unity? Are you trying to teach us about an epiphany that you’ve had? What is your purpose in these questions?
2007-04-15 20:09:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The united are the team spirit, a totality pointed out as one, and a team spirit transits in its atmosphere of time-area. A team spirit might exchange its atmosphere as its atmosphere variations it.
2016-12-20 15:58:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the realm of opposites evething is in a order.when u blend the
oppsites no order will be there .u can generate paradoxes,
2007-04-16 00:26:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by artventura_maruf 1
·
0⤊
0⤋