English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i dont get it bush doesnt want iran to have nuclear bombs but america has em

2007-04-15 19:33:55 · 18 answers · asked by Arian 3 in News & Events Current Events

18 answers

America wants to threaten people unilaterally, providing weapons to Israel to kill Palestinians, Lebanese, and Syrian and threatening many other countries in the region.

Attacking and killing many Afghans, Iraqis, Threatening Iran, firing rockets on Sudan.

And then establish comedic organization under the name of Human Rights Watch to black list free organizations and countries calling them terrorist sponsors.

2007-04-16 20:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by Judge 2 · 1 1

Iran and the US will have strained relations at best until the Iranian government drops their rhetoric about destroying Israel. The fact that Iran is ignoring the rest of the world in regards to its nuclear weapons program also will strain relations. Until those issues are addressed, the US will not "unite." Other issues, like the fact that Iran is virtually a theocracy makes the democratic and secular Americans a little nervous. Iran needs to stop being so fanatical, or the US won't have much to do with them other than commerce. If Iran wants to be the friend of the US, then they need to be more democratic and welcoming of all religions. Americans generally consider the religiously/racially/ethnically intolerant to be backwards and don't want a lot to do with them. America is not for or against any religion. It happens that most Americans are Christian. That doesn't mean that Americans are concerned with spreading Christianity to other nations as a national goal. Individual Americans might desire this, but as a country, the US has no desire now or ever to impose religion on anyone. The US only objects to radical Islam, not Islam in general. The only Muslims we have problems with are the ones that want to kill us. We won't be against Sunnis if we were to become better friends with Iran.

2016-05-21 01:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yes, the US has nuclear weapons and is the only country to use them. Of course the US used these weapons to stop further destruction of lives and even told the Japanese they had these weapons even asked them to view the destructive power of them so Japan would stop fighting, but Japan refused.
Has the US threatened to use these weapons as a first strike weapon after that like Iran has? NO.
The US and BUSH(for all you BUSH haters) doesn't want anyone to use these terrible weapons even the US. Sure they have scenarios played out for the use. Have you ever taken a business class? Every business has a contingency plan to use in case of emergency, but they hope these plans never have to be used but they are prepared in case the use is required. BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY.
All the talk about attacking Iran stems solely from their desire to have nuclear capabilities. Russia has given Iran a lucrative plan to help Iran with nuclear power technology. Iran needs to prove they will use this technology for purely energy needs and NOT for other means!
What if Iran uses this technology to attack America and not Israel? do you get that? Please wake up and don't spew the liberal media views that continually try to attack a man who wants to keep you safe

2007-04-16 06:40:58 · answer #3 · answered by wayne 4 · 1 1

We had them before the agreement was made by all the super powers agree to not make anymore. We have agreed to not make anymore and the ones that we do have will be useless in another couple years. Those things have a pretty short shelf life from what I have read. I think it is only like 25 years but I could be way off on that number. This is why Bush and a lot of others do not want Iran to have them. Ours will shortly be gone and Iran will be pumping them out, becoming a major threat to anyone world wide. It will not get to this point though, as I promise you someone will step in and stop them. We have no other choice.

2007-04-15 22:08:47 · answer #4 · answered by Danny 6 · 0 1

Bush does not want the military balance between Iran and neighbors, especially Israel, to divert for the benefit of Iran.I think Iran should not have nuclear bomb. Nuclear bombs should be out of the Middle East countries.

2007-04-15 22:16:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It doesn't seem very fair, does it?But imagine that you have a gun with no intent to use it.You just have it to protect yourself.You have had that gun ever since someone shot at you first.So, you got a bigger gun and now nobody dares shoot at you.But a guy who has a lot of hate for you and for a lot of others wants a gun.He insists that he just wants it because it will make him feel safer or because he needs the gun powder to operate his other machinery.But you know that the minute he gets mad enough he will use that gun to kill you or someone else.He doesn't have the restraint to hold his anger from using the most lethal weapon he has against whoever he is mad at.Would you want him to have a gun?Now picture that gun is a weapon that can kill millions.

It is not just Bush that has a problem with Iran having a Nuclear weapon.Most of the major nations don't want Iran to be armed with such a deadly weapon.Nations should not be trying to acquire these weapons.They should be trying to have them dismantled.

2007-04-15 20:53:30 · answer #6 · answered by Tobeornottobe 3 · 1 1

Iran don't have nuclear bombs but They have s.Th better oil and gas and geopolitical situation so us try to make them weak by all the way they are able and destroy their economic and show them wild and dangerous for all the world(remind 300) after that start war the scenario is similar to Iraq war.

2007-04-15 19:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by roxana 1 · 1 0

What's to get? America got nuclear bombs to END a war and as a deterrent for future wars. Iran wants nuclear bombs to START a war. They have already promised to wipe Israel off the map.

2007-04-15 19:39:02 · answer #8 · answered by Thegustaffa 6 · 7 1

So far the nuclear bomb has been released twice in warfare. Both times it was released by the United States. I would like to answer your question in a more direct manner. However, is it necessary to do so?

2007-04-17 15:52:50 · answer #9 · answered by spanner 6 · 0 0

Have you read the news about Iran?
Their supreme court has overturned the convictions of several serial killers, on the grounds that the victims had engaged in un-Islamic behavior.
Not to mention the outrageous way the IRG went into Iraqi waters to kidnap 15 British military personnel, and the shameful way they treated them.
Aside from the fact that they are training Iraqi terrorists.....
And this is how they act without nuclear weapons.
Get real.

2007-04-15 19:52:28 · answer #10 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers