Americans are pushing for the Armenian Bill because it allows for white-horse diplomacy with no real international backlash. Basically, we get to look good for condemning genocide, and it doesn't matter that we're blaming somebody because the "somebody" is a defunct empire whose governance was legally inherited by the Republic of Turkey in 1923. Not to mention, Turkey will do anything it can to separate itself idealistically from the Ottoman Empire, as it has a severe case of personality cult syndrome vis-a-vis Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (the guy who basically made Turkey take a political and cultural 180 from everything that the Ottoman empire had been).
Bottom line: we get to say genocide is bad at a a time when we need to look good in the eyes of the international community, and the international community doesn't particularly care because modern Turkey doesn't give a rip about their Ottoman heritage.
And as far as if it's the job of politicians to judge history, I only have this to say: Politicians can judge history all they want (part of their job, I would argue, is judging history to determine what we can learn from it) -- it is NOT the job of a politician to REWRITE history, or to punish people nowadays for things we're not sure whether their ancestors did or did not do. Which one is being done nowadays with the Armenian Bill is debatable.
2007-04-15 18:19:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Max G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Germany has apologized for what it did to Jews in Europe in World War II. Japan has apologized for the war crimes it committed in China and other parts of Asia during World War II. In both cases, it was a different government from the government that runs those countries now. The Ottoman Empire killed hundreds of thousands of Armenian Christians in 1915 and 1916. It makes no sense that the republic founded by Amal Ataturk, a republic that has guaranteed equal rights for all religions for nearly 80 years, a NATO member and an important player in the Middle East would deny what is an obvious historical fact. No one is saying that the current Turkish government had anything to do with it. Why deny the Armenians the fact of their historical holocaust?
2007-04-15 18:12:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by mattapan26 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I supported Clinton and McCain and I do not remorse it. Everyone hailed Obama as this excellent Messiah, however I noticed correct by way of him. What did he accomplish in Congress, I puzzled? I do not like McCain's coverage on many matters, however he used to be a POW, he made sacrifices for our nation. That units a precedent. As for Clinton, Bill made a few very egregious errors within the White House. But, that is the way you be taught... as any individual who has enjoy within the white condominium, I consider like (Hillary) Clinton might have carried out that as president. I honestly regarded balloting for Obama, whilst I first learn approximately him. I quite preferred him and his air of mystery and international relations. But, I did a few study and discovered I did not believe his stand. That's predominant if you happen to wish to vote carefully. I feel it is predominant to be diplomatic and check out to barter earlier than speeding into conflict, however Hugo Chavez is a recognized enemy of the US. I might in no way believe him (Chavez). Miguel is a lovable identify! (I recognise I've digressed, however some thing :-)) Many of my peers could have supported Obama and I imply this with all admire, I nonetheless love you, it is honestly exciting to disagree and I'm nonetheless your buddy and all that. :-)
2016-09-05 14:19:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by lago 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry. What is the Armenian Bill?
2007-04-15 17:50:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
turkey has to stop killing everyone! if they went and exterminated the indians it would be no surprise. ****** murderers. whos next?
2007-04-15 17:43:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kleo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋