Should there be a salary cap for baseball?

Question

I do not like how the MLB has no salary cap where other pro sports like the NBA does. This way, teams like the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox can't hog expensive all-stars and leave smaller franchises like Pittsburgh Pirates in the dark. Who agrees with me?!

Answer 1

I do

Answer 2

Maybe a few decades ago, the salary cap could be a legitimate idea. Now, however, there is no way.

Teams like the Yankees or Red Sox would have to cut their teams down dramatically; basically, they would have to start from scratch.

The salary cap is usually implemented to hinder a team from getting too "powerful." However, at least in baseball, the teams who have the most money don't necessarily win the most games. For example, the Yankees throw money around like it's nothing, and get players who don't necessarily get along with each other. This may sound cliched, but without the cooperation of your teammates, you cannot play to your fullest potential.

When was the last time the Yankees were in the World Series? It's been a few years, and they have the highest payroll of any team in professional sports.

Both the Cardinals and Tigers had relatively high payrolls last year, but nowhere near as high as the Yankees or Red Sox. They made the World Series.

In short, the salary cap would just make things more complicated. And the Pirates? Well, they're getting there...give them a few more years.

Answer 3

I don't. I'm a Minnesota Twins fan, so don't try and tell me my team wins with no cap.

So a team loses a good player because they can't compete with the Yankees? Oh well. That's why they have the compensation program. If you lose a key player, you get the team who signed him's first round pick and another pick called the sandwich pick.

Also, as forementioned, there is still the luxury cap. And how can you make a team spend that money "to help" the team? Who's judging what will help the team?

As for hogging all the "expensive all-stars" I suggest the "smaller" franchises learn how to draft and use the minor leagues. Before a player can even be a free agent, he has to have enough ML service time, so you can at least use up four or five good years before getting two picks for him.

A lot of people forget that baseball also takes skill. Just because you make more than someone else doesn't mean you're better than him. Would you rather have Ted Lilly and his $40,000,000 dollar contract, or Johan Santana and his $20,000,000?

So yea, quit whining because your Pirates aren't winning right now. Give them a couple of years, they have some good young players and will be something. A cap won't make them into instant contenders.

Answer 4

This Answer contains Name drops

Oakland A's - NEVER PAY THEIR PLAYERS... And they whip on the Angels EVERY YEAR!!! (21st team on Salary List)

Anaheim Angels - Have the 3rd highest salary in all the MLB ( won the title in 01' WOW!!! Doesn't mean they should blow all their money like idiots though!! They should do what the marlins do... Pay their players 1 year win it all and then dump them all.. Just to do it all over again 6-7 years later!)

New York Yankee's - Spend damn near 200 million every year and they haven't won a world series in a long time (Considering their salary spending)

Like dude above me said... New York Knicks spend a ton of money just to have a losing record all year... Dallas Mavericks are also guilty of passing the SALARY CAP and paying the tax... And How many Championship have they had since the CUBAN era??? Better yet, how many times have they made it to the FINALS???? a big ONCE!!!!

Salary Cap, is for chumps!

Answer 5

I think that since there is a league minimum salary, I believe it's around $380,000 or so, there should be a league maximum. Honestly, no one should make $20M to play baseball in one year. If there is a maximum salary, there would be no need for a cap. Usually, first year players make the minimum, so why not say players with five years of MLB experience can earn the maximum. If a ceiling is set at $8M, the small market teams can compete financially. The operating costs for the teams would be lowered, and it might be cheaper for the fans. What do you think of that?

Answer 6

As a Marlins fan I see where you're coming from. As you may know they have revenue sharing in baseball, which takes some of the profits of the bigger market teams and then they distribute it among the smaller market teams. The problem with this is that the teams can then use the money for anything, or, as many of them do, for nothing at all. It is now being proposed that these teams have to use this money to improve their teams, which I think sounds like a great idea.

The Marlins for example got 10 million dollars last year from this and didn't do anything with it. This money could have been used to help out their bullpen, or to pick up a good center fielder.

I think that this would at least help bridge the gap between the large market teams and the smaller market teams.

Answer 7

Yes, there should be a cap and a floor such as the NHL has, supported by a broad system of revenue sharing; but don't hold your' breath. The players union would never allow it. I agree with you wholeheartedly, but you would be amazed at the number of baseball fans who are against this. I cant see how they think that the buy-a-player system, where the Yankees can treat the KC Royals or the Pirates like a farm team, is the way to go, but many of them do; go figure.

Answer 8

hell no there shouldnt be a salary cap. you get out what you put into your team. look at the yankees for example. they are always in the playoffs. and then look at the devil rays, royals, and pirates, im pretty sure they could hav a winning team if they really wanted to, but they dont wana spend so they deserve to hav a crappy team. in the nba look at the knicks. they spend the most money yet they are a terrible team, then you look at a team like the oakland a's, they know how to get more bang for the buck

Answer 9

The sales cap works interior the NFL by way of fact the television settlement is controlled via the league and each and each team shares an equivalent quantity of that money. In baseball communities have their own television contracts so the Yankess (who own the particular community) and the crimson Sox (NESN) are going to make lots greater money than the Royals and despite community they play on. till you could convince the Yankees to surrender a majority of their income that they are earning legally than a cap won't artwork. the ingredient which will artwork is increasing the luxurious tax. in the event that they tax the communities greater while their payroll will develop then communities like the Yankees might finally might desire to cut back the quantity they spend in the event that they nevertheless intend to make a earnings.

Answer 10

Yes, there should be salary cap, because of all the stars going to bigger teams. I like the Indians, so a salary cap wouldn't hurt my team much since we don't spend any money anyway.

Answer 11

Yes but only if there is a corresponding salary "floor" also. That is, a minimum that teams can pay. That will prevent teams from not putting profits back into their team in the form of player salaries.