I'm just thinking,PMS....it's going to bad,very bad.
2007-04-15 16:37:07 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
ooops I ment menapause.
2007-04-15 16:39:05 · update #1
get over it.
2007-04-15 16:39:21 · answer #1 · answered by kitten lover3 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. I used to think "A woman?! ..No freakin way!!"
2. Then over the years i thought "Ok, a woman might be good, she'll get the job done, and buck up against the ol' boy network"
3. I finally realized " It makes no difference , the president will be a puppet and a public figurehead for those that are REALLY running the country and making the decisions which the president will have NO say in whatsoever, and the title is just THAT only.."
2007-04-15 23:57:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be an interesting experiment. I don't think things would be very different. I worry about war situations, but in peaceful times it would depend on the woman. There have been effective female leaders in other countries.
2007-04-15 23:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK-
Actually, If I recall-
Didn't Hilary already do a stint in the white house?
OH, that's right,,,,
she just let her husband sit in the drivers seat-
but she gave him the directions..........
If it is Hilary, I am not republican, but I think she could
handle it-
PMS could be a good thing for us,,,,bad for other countries,,,,
Men get MSB-so what difference does it make?
2007-04-15 23:43:35 · answer #4 · answered by trinity3x3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would ba great having a woman president.... They would be more decisive & more calm at handling stuff... I'm not saying man presidents aren't bad... I'm just saying it might be good for a change to have a woman as a president...
That's only what i think...
2007-04-15 23:42:40 · answer #5 · answered by Mystery 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate how it would be a big deal for the U.S. to have a female president. Other countries have had them. It's not a huge development. It's not like the U.S. is pioneering anything here. It annoys me that the focus would be on the candidate's sex rather than her ideas.
2007-04-15 23:41:31 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Fannerman 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am a woman but I don't really want a woman president. I would only vote for one if I really had to.
2007-04-15 23:41:09 · answer #7 · answered by Michelle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they can't do any worse of a job that what has been going on for the last 20 years. Probably won't happen anytime soon, though.........
2007-04-15 23:45:53 · answer #8 · answered by Suzie- Q 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's sexist..perhaps a woman needs to get in there,the men don't have pms for an excuse now do they?
2007-04-15 23:40:59 · answer #9 · answered by shasha 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im always biased with a woman president.
womens are smart i agree but
not being a president.
2007-04-16 00:11:11 · answer #10 · answered by oo00dawn00oo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as it isn't Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi!!!!
2007-04-16 00:44:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋