Former G.W. Bush speech writer says Administration used 9/11 to invade Iraq and hints at 9/11 coverup?

Question

http://digg.com/politics/Former_Bush_Speechwriter_Hints_at_9_11_Inside_Job

Victor Gold, former Bush speech writer accuses current administration and exposes their zeal for creating a pretext for a war that was planned many years in advance in his new book, "Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the Neo-Cons and Holy Rollers Destroyed the GOP"

He probably to wants to say 9/11 is a total inside job, fraud, or at the very least a very obvious cover up, but he is probably scared for his life or not ready to go public yet.

Sorry, but the real reason we went into Iraq is not because Saddam tried to kill Bush Sr. The real reason we are in Iraq is because the Conservative think tank (mostly Jews and some Jews of dual citizenship) that wrote PNAC needed the US to invade Iraq for the defense of Israel. This is not anti Semitism but it is fact!

Answer 1

We all know Bush did it!

Answer 2

He DID NOT say that 9/11 was an inside job and used as an excuse to invade Iraq!!! What kind of a boob are you. Just because YOU think something is true, doesn't mean it is and you are slanderous putting those words in Mr. Golds mouth.

Anyone who has half a brain and pays attention to the news (NOT FOX), reads a newspaper once in a while, watches CSpan and reads a book occasionally already knows that Rummie, Cheney, Bush and the boys started planning the invasion during Bushies boys first run for President.

I read Mr. Gold's book and it is very revealing indeed. You might try reading it. Or do you think words of more than 2 syllables might make your brain explode?

Answer 3

Ok I don't like to say this and this may offend some people ,but the real reason we went to Iraq was because Saddam tried to kill bushes father and he needed an excuse to get that oil from Iraq ,because President Bush is an oil man himself. Very true Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 .This oppurtunity opened up for him ,why not get some oil and get rid of saddam and look like a hero and lie to every American . Alot of republicans may get affended by this and far as weapons of mass -destruction there are none. I support are troops and war ,but not one to steal oil from countries and then turn around and raise up the gas prices. I have friends and family in the service ,but I don't think there lives are worth oil. If you believe everything your told then don't get affend by me saying we went to Iraq for oil , which has been right there ,also if you think I am wrong then you should have no problem of paying higher gas prices everytime we invade a countrie for oil. This is for the people who read this. As for the person asking this question you ask a very good question, your right he is scared for his life. He knows something and hes not allowed to say more. He can't go public because know one will believe him. Those who know the facts know hes right. Others can believe what they want. These are just my opinions.

Answer 4

If you forget the non-sense that Bush instigated the attack, you'll find a much more interesting and true story of how Bush and Cheney used the attack to invade Iraq even though Iraq was not involved with 9/11.

Truth is better than fiction.

Answer 5

no person ever stated that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. in spite of the undeniable fact that, Bush could link the two mutually in his speeches, asserting "9/11" around the comparable time he could talk approximately "Iraq". that's an advertising gimmick. yet Bush isn't the 1st guy or woman who theory-approximately invading Iraq. in case you circulate returned a pair greater years, John Kerry develop into pushing to invade Iraq, yet then-President Clinton did no longer desire to circulate to conflict. this is the deal. Al-Qaida's greatest criticism develop into that the U. S. had air bases in Saudi Arabia, their "holy land". Iraq develop into no longer seen truly Muslim to the different, greater strict Arab countries, and so the gamble develop into that no person can care over there if we invaded it and outfitted our air bases there fairly. And so we did. At way too intense a value, IMO, and that i do no longer recommend funds.

Answer 6

This guy, Gold, sounds like he has an axe to grind. Bush did publically announce that Saddam had no connection to 9/11.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/18/iraq/main584234.shtml

Inside job? Popular Mechanics has offered scientific proof that there was no 'inside job'.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Answer 7

WE already know there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11. I am not too sure about the other part of this.

Answer 8

Here is a well made documentary that gets to the heart of where the U.S. finds itself and how and why we got into this conflict.
Unfortunately, the administration have been out of touch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlcpXBFOXA

The few soldiers that I know say that moral is very low as many of the troops are feeling disillusioned.
They are coming to see the truth of what this war is really about and how they are being used as pawns for the current regime's quest for a New American Century.
Here is a link to a well made documentary with expert comments from current and former military personell.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlcpXBFOXA

this is just one part of the 10 part documentary.

This segment is really good in that exposes the administration's lack of military service and how out of touch they really are.

Answer 9

Yes, I think it's getting pretty much known by everyone now what Bush did & why! I just wish something could be done about it, like Bush being held accountable for his lies & for all the people that have been killed or hurt because of him! It just makes me sick to see his face on TV & or hear his voice!

Answer 10

So you are ready to believe an ex-speech writer (probably fired) over the thousands of others that disagree with him. Sounds like you searched very hard for someone that agress with your agenda.

Answer 11

Would you be trying to cover up the liberal flip flopper who was for the war before he was against the war that he was for ?