Inside job...no doubt about it. Keep asking these questions! It drives the NeoCons crazy, I think it's funny. You are a true American Patriot.
2007-04-15 15:28:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ugly Betty 3
·
2⤊
13⤋
There is not a single 9/11 conspiracy theory that I find remotely plausible.
* The gov't shot down United 93. – That claim has been debunked so many times that repeating it only soils the memory of the heroes of the flight.
* The gov't was behind the attacks. – There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start.
1. What possible reason would the US gov't have to kill 3000 of its own?
2. Bush is nowhere near smart enough to arrange it.
3. The planning of the 9/11 attacks began in 1998. Who was running the gov’t in 1998?
4. It would require so many agencies of the gov't working together that that alone makes it impossible, much less keeping it secret.
5. No one currently or formerly working in any government agency has come forward with any contradiction of the official report.
6. If 9/11 was an inside job, and the gov’t would have no qualms killing 3000 of its own to start a war, it wouldn’t hesitate to kill the conspiracy theorists.
7. Doesn't the fact that Osama admitted to it mean anything to anyone?
* The FDNY was ordered to implode the building. – Okay, the FDNY lost 343 good men and women because they were busy planting explosives with such perfect precision that the building imploded straight down. Does that make sense to anyone?
* The Zionists/Mossad/Israel was behind the attacks. 4000 Jews stayed home from work. – First, this was started by Hezbollah, which, before 9/11, led all terrorist orgs in number of Americans killed. Second, many Jews were among the dead and injured. I guess they missed the email. Third, many Christians and Muslims and others took the day off or were late. Did they get the email instead of the Jews? Or was it that 9/11/01 was primary day in New York State and some people of all religious backgrounds needed to work on campaigns that day?
* Mossad knew about the attacks beforehand. – This is true. Mossad, MI6, the CIA and FBI, and other intelligence agencies worldwide all knew something was going to happen. Unfortunately, no one knew what, when, how, where, or by whom.
2007-04-15 15:37:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I am open minded to the 9/11 conspiracies and many other conspiracies.
But the 9/11 conspiracies like other conspiracies, global warming, seed are sowed and take root and then are harvested and that exactly whats happening here. Take the UFO craze true or not the seeds were planted and are being harvested, With all that is said by the media & special interest groups there is a story everyone can believe, be it true or false. It's time to question but trying to find the answer to what really happen that day and why is hidden from the general public. They know that seeing is believing, but sometimes we can't distinguish optical illusions from reality, trickery is a Mother Focker.
2007-04-15 15:42:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by man of ape 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look at everything else that's happened. Look at all the terrorist attacks and wars and such. Were they ever perfect? Has anyone ever found everything to be exactly as predicted? Despite science and logical thinking, there is no perfect attack, and no flawless action. Maybe there is an inside job, maybe there isn't. I don't know. They don't know. Nobody knows for sure. I do know one thing, though; the mind believes what it chooses to believe. I have doubted my very own opinions at times, but I also doubt the opinions of others. Who is right? Who is wrong? Fact has shown to be false before, and if we are notorious for repeating our mistakes, why shouldn't "fact" be wrong again?
To make a fair point, there are many one-sided conspiracy theorists out there, too, who do not try to analyze, and these are the ones who seem to make more of a show that anyone else. And there are the anti-conspiracy theorists who show to be one-sided, too.
Hell, I've tried looking onto their websites and databases and such, and I've spent many hours reading and working things out, but even after all that, I am still left uncertain of their theories.
2007-04-15 15:26:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People who question the official version of any story are laughed at. The big problem is, their are variations to every story. All History is only one pushed in your face by the establishment version. The contrary facts on 9-11 are thick and piled high. Many legitimate questions go unanswered. Yet the establishment will push their story hard, and continue kookafyeing all of the rest. So History is written,not with all the loose ends, but by cutting off the loose ends, and tying it into a bundle that's neatly crafted.
2016-05-21 00:50:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The official, bipartisan report stands on its own. The burden of proof lies with all who dispute its findings.
In over five years and countless investigations, studies and, yes, conspiracy theories - not one single shred of verifiable and valid proof to the contrary has been produced.
An open mind is a good thing, but it must be open to the truth, and not open to unreliable sources, out of context quotes, speculation, unscientific dogma and some idiots' conclusions concerning questions and specifics that no one can know the answers to.
The collapse of the WTCs was a complex and unique event caused by the actions of a few demented Islamic radicals - the same radicals that have been perpetrating acts of war, terror and murder against Americans all over the globe for over 25 years - why is that so difficult for some people to accept?
Simply connect the dots - when the terrorists commit these acts for so long with pretty much impunity, it only makes sense that they would ultimately result in an event such as occurred on 9/11.
2007-04-15 15:38:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I have thought about it. I spent almost an entire wasted day looking into the claims of 9/11 conspiracy theorists, including the points that you bring up. What I found was a sound debunking from top experts in their fields, of everything I have ever heard from you people. People have posted the sites that answer and debunk these claims so many times I haven't even bothered to keep the links. I'll be surprised if someone doesn't post them under your question. The one thing that none of you ever, ever, have an answer for is how on earth did the conspirators manage to get thousands of people to lie so convincingly and then stay quiet; and the cell phone companies to fix their records; and honestly? If all the people who have told their stories from that day are lying they should all get Academy Awards. Another problem with all your stories is that some of you have theories about only part of the setup, and some of you differ in how far you actually take the conspiracy.
Why is it easier to believe a conspiracy theory than experts who have explained all your questions? Why is it easier to dismiss experts and persist in some Machiavellian fantasy than it is to call a duck and duck and be done with it? Sorry, I've done my homework, and until I see something that makes sense and hasn't yet been explained there's nothing to change my mind about in my opinion. But have at it, when you find the proof people will start to take you seriously.
2007-04-15 15:29:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Sorry, but you're on a dead-end road. Liberals have blamed
Bush (and his staff) for every single thing they could, ever
since he took office. Its just another liberal thinking up some
possible way that Bush could have also been behind 911
and get gullible people (more libs) to back them up. Why
would Bush even want to commit such an atrocity? If you
say so he could go to war, that is just plain stupid. No one
likes war and you surely can see that whoever is president
sending our fine volunteers to war, will never ever be
a popular president. Bush's poll numbers fell through the
roof. Now what president would want that to happen and
go to war to make it happen? Makes no sense. Makes
no sense. Many terrorist plans have been caught and
cancelled since the patriot act was put into place. The
media does not want to tell you about this tho.....isn't
that strange?????
2007-04-15 15:30:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
No, because there was no conspiracy, well there was if your talking about Bin laden and the 19 hijackers, but nobody in the U.S., or the government, or anything else caused 9/11
And it wasn't a 747 aircraft that supposedly hit the pentagon LOL at least know which kind of aircraft hit it.
2007-04-15 15:18:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Army Retired Guy 5
·
9⤊
0⤋
Yeh and the rest. That is just the tip of the iceberg pal. More than one of the supposed hijackers are alive and well and it doesn't take a genius to see that the whole thing from start to finish is nothing like a kooky Elvis or Alien conspiracy. There is basic irrefutable evidence that is being countered by nonsense and lies. Anyone who believes the official story is a very silly person. Ok look even if you can't wrap your tiny minds around the twin towers being demolished just take one look at building number 7, WTC7 and tell me how a 47 story building that wasn't hit by any plane fell to the ground in under 7 seconds with only a few crappy fires spread thoughout the building. How on this earth does that happen without controlled demolition and you also don't have to be a genius to figure that one out. You sheep have no case whatsoever on that one you cannot explain that one way with your kooky fire bending metal stories. All that debunking the conspiracy theory crap is just that. Half the people who make up that crap agreed that there was something wrong in the first place and then were persuaded to change their minds I am not buying any of that debunking the conspiracy theories crap. That is just exactly what they want you sheep to think. Tell me what the "conspiracy theorists" gain from trying to educate people and then tell me what the government gains from debunking them and then I will tell you who I would be more likely to believe especially given the evidence ways heavily in favour of the so called conspiracy theorist.
2007-04-15 15:23:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
I have been open minded.
I have watched the videos and evidence that they have produced. All of them can be disproven. Most use faulty logic, poor math, out of context quotes, cropped photos, altered videos. All of them ignore any information that doesn't fit their theory. All so called 'new evidence' they come up with now has just been repackaging of their same propoganda. I here everyone cite the 'loose change' video now, all I have to say about that is it was entertaining but completely factualy incorrect. The science has proven over and over their theories are not possible, the evidence proves the theories incorrect.
Yes I do have some questions about certain aspects of the 'intellegence' involved pre event, but I also understand the need to keep certain information confidential. As not to give away any information about our intellegence activities to any one who possibly may use that against this country. (which is another thing theorists point to as proof)
Wow, three thumbs down for viewing both sides of an arguement and coming to an educated and logical decision.
2007-04-15 15:17:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋