Should America's biggest priority in Latin America be the continued expansion of democracy?

Question

The only thing the neo-cons have done in Latin America is try to oust the elected President of Venezuela in a coup.

I wouldn't exactly call that promoting democracy.

democracy is the form of government free people always choose.

Slavery to the propertied class is no better than any other kind.

Answer 1

I believe democracy must be internally created by a strong and empowered middle class. I think it's clear that a democracy that is worth having cannot be externally imposed.

As such, I believe we need to focus on two very related issues. First, we need to work to economically develop those nations - get them to the point where they're doing something more than selling off natural resources to foreign companies.

Additionally, we need to become fierce advocates for workers' rights (both economic and environmental). If people are making subsistence wages and are systematically intimidated by brutal management, then there will be little benefit to the economic development - just wage slavery. If we allow workers to bargain, however, and to get paid more than it costs them to live every day, then we will be sowing the seeds of a true middle class, and therefore the seeds of democracy.

Answer 2

If you look at America's record in Latin America it has been to talk of democracy while supporting repressive regimes. The US supported Somoza in Nicaragua and the dictatorship in El Salvador. When the US supported the military government in Guatemala thousands of civilians died but it was good for United Fruit. In Columbia America is helping to develop a data base which includes all of Columbia's population and thereby putting many lives at risk. Also it is worse looking at groups such as "Project for a new American century" to understand the impetus behind the neo-con foreign policies which have been recently pursued.

Answer 3

"Expansion of democracy" is that what the US administration is calling it? Most people would call it state-sponsored terrorism, but it's all a matter of taste, nes pa? The US has historically used assassination, covert war, and support of dictatorships and death squads to "win friends and influence people" all over Central and South America. And that's why all those countries are running to the LEFT as fast as they can to get away from bloody American corporate fascism and its ruthless oppression of their citizens.

Answer 4

i've got no longer seen the action picture yet have examine a variety of of the makers writing (John Pilger). the U. S. has antagonistic democracy in South u . s . through fact puppet governments enable US companies to apply South American labour and puppet governments enable the U. S. to apply the commerce relationship with South u . s .. The CIA have already admitted involvement in attempting to overthrow Chavez, who's as you rightly say a democratically elected chief!!! the U. S. government are at pains to demonise him and portray him as some form of Stalin discern whilst he grow to be infact elected with extra desirable majorities than any President might desire to ever desire to get. the clarification is that Chavez like another leaders have realised that previous dictatorships have exploited the human beings and saved them unfavorable. quite than persevering with this way Chavez desires to apply venezuelan wealth to advance the lives of the unfavorable (the various) and not in basic terms the lives of the wealthy (the wealthy). it is thoroughly against US doctrine which promotes capitalism and would not choose for to help the unfavorable and needy. Chavez is a socialist yet unlike Marx or the different socialist. Chavez needs the human beings to help theselves yet he might actually help them in doing so. an engaging statistic is that there is now a hundred% literacy in Venezuela as subsequently literacy courses presented by using Chavez. absolutely everyone now has a shot at elementary coaching. Chavez desires to apply the rustic's huge oil wealth to advance the rustic as an entire quite than in basic terms lining the wallet of the rustic's good oil experts (US type). the final public human beings voters in basic terms won't be in a position to withstand the certainty their governments have supported a number of brutal dictators in countless South Ameruican worldwide places that have introduced approximately the deaths of hundreds. the U. S. in straight forward terms help democracy on their words (for this reason they do no longer help Chavez who grow to be democratically elected). the U. S. additionally concern the capability of South u . s .. South u . s . is a slumbering substantial. If it have been to unite contained in the comparable way as Europe has then they may be a significant capability contained in the area. As all of us comprehend, the U. S. desires to be in straight forward terms enormous new child on the block and could no longer stand by using idly through fact the hot new child stakes his declare. Even now Bush helps the Colombian government which utilises deaths squads.

Answer 5

No. It should be to preserve (if not expand) freedom. Freedom & democracy are not the same thing - see who the Palistinians elected? See what the Iraqis call a constitution? Somehow, Chevez stays...a product of democracy or of freedom?

Answer 6

The US's only legitimate foreign policy is the promotion of US national interests. I really don't care if the locals are eating each other and living in grass huts. Their government can worry about them. Mine should be working towards expanding our wealth, influence, and security.

Answer 7

No, the priority must be the expansion of "Export Trade."
America must sell more products to its hemispherical neighbors.
This will reduce deficits and imporve GDP.

Answer 8

no to interfere in another country and not leave it up to the citizens of the country is the opposite of democracy . every u.s. intervention was not about democracy. in Guatemala para militaries massacres of villagers. el salvador death squads , Argentina military coup, Brazil military coup, torture and dissapearancesin Argentina.

Answer 9

Not the way the neocons do it. Democracy at gunpoint makes no sense.

Answer 10

democracy, fair trade, economic development, and continued peace and friendly relations