Did you know that the World Trade Center towers and building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolitions?

Question

NO building, let alone 3 steel buildings, will EVER be able to collapse at free fall speed without the use of explosives.

Nor will a simple gravitational collapse EVER cause thousands of tons of concrete and glass to spontaneously pulverize into fine dust in mid air.

Those buildings were brought down by explosives. And 9/11 was an inside job.
,......

Alen S, I doubt you’re an engineer, as you can't seem to distinguish between the events leading up to a collapse and the collapse itself.

5quid, a few terrorist might have had the ability to do what? The ability to plant explosives in buildings that Bush's brother and cousin provided security for, or the ability to defy the laws of gravity?

Tell you what, Tom C. You prove me wrong, and I'll slit my wrists. How about that?

Dallas....,

1) Gutting out buildings is not necessary for the actual demolition of buildings. They gut out buildings in order to avoid too much debris and air born toxins such as asbestos and mercury.

2) The world trade towers were notorious money losers because of all the VACANCIES.

3) Silverstein had the right to move tenants around for such reasons as upgrading the infrastructure or planting bombs.

4) Bush’s brother was on the board of the security company that supplied the security for the entire WTC complex. Bush’s cousin was the director of that security company.
.....

Answer 1

Its all common knowledge that more and more people in the US are starting to look into.
The rest of the world already knows it.

Answer 2

OK, I give. There was a conspiracy and the government planted explosives (which would have taken weeks if not months). They then blind folded all employees that worked in the towers during this time so that they couldn't see the master scheme. Then they kept (what would be the biggest story in the last 100 years quiet), even though 98% fo the population can't keep a secret longer than 10 minutes. Then they paid off the media who didn't want to cover the biggest story of the last 100 years. Then they paid off 98% of scientists that said it couldn't happen because they couldn't pay off the 2% that were touched. These would include people like the "short bus" director from "Loose Change", 911truth and all the other "touched" individuals. People DIED that day and there is nothing wrong with questioning the government but when you are giving countless FACTS from experts and still don't listen......Nevermind, I'm wasting my time.

Answer 3

construction 7 became into heavily broken throughout the time of the collapses of the WTC. After that, fires burned for countless hours in the path of the construction, persevering with to weaken the helps. as quickly as the construction collapsed, gravity dictated the value of the autumn. The "rebar, cement, columns etc" have been already weakened and destroyed, and the sheer mass of the top flooring pulverized them interior microseconds. asserting "loose fall speeds" is basically an attempt to sound scientific, yet the way it incredibly is used right it incredibly is incomprehensible. As for transport the cloth to China, I haven't any concept if that became into surely executed, or why it ought to be executed. genuinely there have been extra convenient guidance on the thank you to eliminate the cloth. And given the character of the collapses, it would be impossible to handle debris from the towers from WTC 7, so back it is not smart. What I bear in mind is that all the cloth became into shipped to a minimum of one spot, taken care of, studied, then disposed of as quickly because it became into examined. yet going alongside which comprise your if. WTC 7 held a command center for emergency administration. The loss of this construction ought to and did intervene with working the incident that way. in any different case, there is not any value in concentrated on 7. If terrorists ought to plant bombs secretly in there, they did no longer would desire to worry with planes in the towers. Why waste attempt on 7, while they might have long previous after the Empire State construction or any type of different landmark targets, multiplying the phobia of the assaults? So, sorry, i do no longer purchase into the "truther" conspiracy theories. alongside with wtc 7/

Answer 4

The mind believes what it wants to believe... and all this mob psychology you and your creed are bearing down on people who can't think for themselves might as well be a pointless protest. Stop trying to convert people as if this deal is a religion. Your truth is just as different than any other truth, and neither side can prove whether 9/11 was planned or not, so why don't we just wait and see what the future holds? Sorry that you can't seem to grasp that, and I'm very sorry that your creed can't grasp the fact that yes, a few terrorists might have had the ability to do something like that.

I'm not here to argue with you, boy.

Answer 5

Was NOT a controlled demolition. In controlled demolition you have to gut out the structure first, pre-cut steel beams, place explosives. With all of this effort, it would have been noticed...(See the recent implosion of the Las Vegas hotel - this is controlled demo and you can see level of effort needed)

Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. is a demolition expert in demolition services, wrecking and conventional demolition

Answer 6

I've been doing engineering design work for almost 30 years and for most of that time it's been in fire protection. In all that time I have never run across any fire retardant material that will protect structural steel from 2,000 deg for 6 hours with no loss of strength, much less bare steel. (whatever fire retardant spray they used back in the 70's on that steel; I'm certain it did not remain intact after being impacted from the side at over 250 MPH by several hundred tons of aircraft.
If you had any engineering background you would know that you don't have to melt steel to cause it to fail, Jack.
does this answer look familiar? it should it's the same one I gave to you 10 minutes ago when you asked an similar and equally idiotic question. you really don't want to understand, you just want to spout oral diarrea

Answer 7

Rosie? Is that you???

Stay out of here with your insanity. You should be imprisoned.

It's YOUR accusation.
The burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders, Rosie.

I'll only add that this being against President Bush would only be STRONG evidence that the Dems would have been the ones to do it.

Answer 8

That's old news. Did you hear the Titanic struck an iceberg?

Answer 9

You asked this type of "question" 2 weeks ago. I'll give you the sites others gave you then.

http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/158816635X/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_1/103-2727546-3883868

But something tells me you never looked at these sites before & won't look at them now. "Don't confuse me with facts. I've already made up my mind."

And you will give "best answer" some other paranoid knucklehead who agrees with you.

Answer 10

Sure... and man has never landed on the moon either right? It was all filmed in a studio in Hollywood... uh huh. So I guess you are a physicist then?