...the failure of 9-11,
or after the invasion of a country which didn't attack us?
2007-04-15 11:20:40 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
....it's really a toss up for me, so not much has changed since the very beginning.
2007-04-15 11:21:38 · update #1
LOL>..Doc: Since you are so keen on that intellectual form of debate being a constant offender in insulting participants,
I thought I'd asking how well that B/A is serving you from Pat Robertson university? Should it be any surprise that the military loves a Republican administration?
Keep up the good fight for fascism my friend.
I'm sure you have the ability to look up that word with your oft touted credentials.
2007-04-15 12:12:42 · update #2
The people who you refer to attacking the person who asked the above question are sheep. George bush is their retarded shepherd and his flock of sheep will follow him where ever he may go. These people don't like to answer the question without trying to discredit her because that is the only way they know how to deal with it. The facts are there for all to see but these blind fools will never accept the truth. They would rather believe that the security of the most powerful nation in the world decided to go on holiday on 9/11 and let 4 planes be hijacked simultaneously and flown to different parts of the country unchallenged to crash land in their respective destinations because it is easier for their tiny little minds to comprehend. Damn sheep. You just don't get it.
2007-04-15 12:03:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
McCain substitute into and isn't any longer against Bush. He in simple terms reported that he's not Bush because of the fact Obama saved accusing him of being some form of clone- implying that everyone Republicans are the same.He helps Bush on some subject concerns and not on others.this is how i've got faith. i do no longer hate each physique. yet I do hate the bashing because of the fact i think of its incorrect. EDIT- His quote substitute right into a valid reaction and he by no ability as quickly as mentioned he substitute into against Bush.
2016-11-24 20:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by kluesner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I still don't hate Bush. I don't hate Clinton, either.
As far as whether Bush stole the election, I think this is a matter of opinion.
And I think many of the people who think Bush stole the election have been using the Supreme Court to enact their own agenda for over 30 years.
2007-04-15 11:30:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First of all, he didn't steal the election. All of the recounts done by the liberal press prove it so get over it already! Besides, the democrats tried to undermine the results, but failed. Why blame Bush for that? The failure of 911 was a big national failure, certainly due more to soft on security liberals who were part on the infrastructure long before Bush took office. Quit crying about the past and move on!
2007-04-15 11:28:36 · answer #4 · answered by oogabooga37 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Which recount in Florida were you upset about? Was it the 12th recount or the one still going on today by liberals such as yourself who can't let an event that happened 7 years ago go. 9/11 was his fault? I agree he ignored warning signs for his 8 months in office before 9/11 but is Clinton in his 8 YEAR run innocent. You know that answer as well as I do. Afghanistan didn't attack us either. Should we have went there and still be there?
2007-04-15 11:26:31 · answer #5 · answered by Rightwing 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I dont hate the president I have better things to do with my time. If you want to bring change you could start by not complaining about the problems and doing something constructive to change them. I mean that is what the "neoconservatives" say about the democrats right. That they're too busy saying what wont work to find something that will.
2007-04-15 11:29:38 · answer #6 · answered by Theodore Sebastian 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I guess you're one of THOSE who slept through the first gulf war and the whole U.N. cease fire agreement thing that was ignored by both Sadam And the U.N.. You should try actually studying history. You might just learn something. Honestly, I hated Bill Clinton a whole lot more -- and I worked for the man! So, Bush isn't so big on popularity contests and does what he knows to be the right thing, regardless... Yep, good reasoning on your part. They have "names" for people like you, but you'd only have me sensored for speaking the truth and offending you who are intolerant.
2007-04-15 11:34:17 · answer #7 · answered by Doc 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I hated him since I've heard he was a dishonest lying crook and when gass prices started rising in 2001!
2007-04-17 01:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by kevdre1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's so much to hate that son of a b*tch about. Hard to choose. I think invading Iraq was the thing he's done to mess up this country the most on many fronts.
2007-04-15 11:29:56 · answer #9 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I didn't hate Bush ever. I didn't vote for him the fist time because he was the least qualified candidate. I didn't vote for him the second time because his record dictated that he be "fired".
He solidified it when he attacked a country that couldn't even defend themselves. and didn't have a thing to do with 9-11
2007-04-15 11:25:23 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋