Remember the good ol Vietnam days when Jane Fonda went to visit the Viet Cong and was blacklisted by the entire country?
Hanoi Pelosi makes me long for those days.
Now THAT'S saying something.
I move for impeachment. Send her and Rosie O'Donnell to Syria and Iran (respectively) and let them finally be at peace. It must be hard acting like they don't want to destroy America everyday.....
2007-04-15 12:47:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, don't have anything legitimate to impeach her on, but that does not mean that what she is doing is completely unraveling any hope that she should be taken seriously. Leave her in there and let's allow the American people see that we should not just vote Democrat/Republican. When are people going to wake up? Don't people see what is happening, being a Democrat seems to mean, do everything opposite of what Republicans are doing, regardless of whether or not it is right or not.
Bipartisanship is a joke, the sooner politicians stop lying about hoping to start this session out with bartisanship, the more that might get done. There is too much finger pointing and blaming. Look at the real evidence, the politicans track record, both at the state level and federal. How do they vote on issues and when it comes to it, when there is pressure, do they change their story?
Forget Republican/Democrat...be smart about your vote...don't take what these politicians says as fact until you check the facts yourself!
2007-04-15 11:17:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by slp 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. Even the thought of that is ridiculous. The Bush administration is one to talk about mistakes. If anyone should be impeached it is the foreign affairs advisors and the administration. She showed diplomacy.. i guess thats too dove-ish these days.
2007-04-16 19:23:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by 11223344 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Nancy Pelosi is going above and beyond the call of duty. She had every right to go to Syria. They have gotten most of what she wanted to get accomplished through the house. Congress still has some compromising to do with the Senate on these issues.
I think her stance on the war in Iraq has caused Bush to replace Rumsfeld with Gates and get General Petraes who will at least use a new strategy instead of just "staying the course." The withdrawal date added to the funding for the war is causing the Iraqi leaders to get their act together much faster.
However, if they actually do pull the funding for the war because of Bush's veto at this time, I will think they are playing politics. Both Bush and Congress. They need to reach a compromise. In my opinion anyway, this isn't the right time to leave Iraq.
Condileeza Rice needs to do some talking to Iran and Syria. As far as I am concerned, they owe it to our military and to the American people to try every single opportunity to end this conflict and leave Iraq in good shape. In view of the stakes, not talking to them is completely negligent and arrogant.
2007-04-15 11:26:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Pelosi is basically spewing the Democratic social gathering line. that is composed of disarming usa, putting the UN on top of problems with usa, knocking out loose speech, disbanding the protection stress, taxing gasoline bigger once you purchase it, and now once you utilize it additionally, destroying business enterprise, and saving the planet from international Warming, ignore with regards to the Muslim terrorists(they are no threat by any ability), Turning usa over to the lazy, ignorant poor. yet then what do you anticipate from a social gathering of freaks and weirdo's. it is not sufficient that 370,000 Whites died battling to loose the slaves, they are out to wreck the Whites additionally. Nero fiddled jointly as Rome burned, The Dems are surely burning usa. A Civil conflict is drawing close.
2016-10-22 06:16:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by corbo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why on God's green earth would anyone want to impeach an Italian Grandmother?
When you could Impeach a drug addict mommas boy for less $$$ and more fun.
Go Team Red Go
2007-04-15 11:20:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Unfortunately, being impeached doesn't mean you get thrown out of office. Clinton was impeached, and he still completed his second term.
2007-04-15 14:15:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some like the Logan Act. I personally favor some type of Presidential sanction against her, for violating his Executive office regarding diplomacy.
I do not see impeachment really helping unite Americans. Besides, what did she accomplish, anyway? Nothing.
2007-04-15 11:01:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Aside from the fact that she has done nothing to warrant even a trial, no. Of course not.
However, I am sure that all here agree that Reagan's violation of the Boland amendment, did warrant his removal from office.
Right?
2007-04-16 10:57:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
buying votes..hummm...failed first 100 days as the speaker of the state of ....oops...wait ..she doesn't have the authority to make treaties..that's the job of the secretary of state..how is that...oh yeah..DR.RICE...
but to your question..hell yeah... impeach madam pelosi....good riddance to bad rubbish
2007-04-15 14:28:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by bluesharpman_642000 3
·
1⤊
0⤋