What would Bush have to do for some of you to think maybe those Dems are right?

Question

Lying about WMD's......completely fabricating Niger Yellowcake story! Many in his cabinet told him not to use that so called evidence and he did in a speech to the public anyway!
Infringing on the constitution--which he took an oath to uphold by the way--with the enactment of the Patriot Act and the 2007 Defense Authorization Act.
Creating the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) making way for the North American Union.
http://www.spp.gov
http://www.freedom.org/naugreen2/player.html
That's why the borders STILL are not secured!
Allowing torture of men,women & children at Abu Ghraib--breaking all of the laws within the Geneva Convention in regard to torture!
Invading Iraq without UN approval ---all the time using the UN's sanctions violations by Saddam as their justification for the invasion! (So every other country should follow UN rules but US)

That's just what I can think of now!

What else will it take?

Answer 1

It is apparent that nothing Bush does will make you Dems happy. However, here is my response...
He didn't lie about WMD's. He may have been mislead, but lying he didn't do. Everyone did actually think Saddam had them. Twisting the recorded facts not only shows your ignorance, but your audacity to attack without proof.
The Niger Yellowcake story was backed up by English intelligence. The so called "many in his cabinet" is a lie. There were some that wanted the CIA to confirm the intelligence, however, at the time, they didn't have a credible report on it. By the way, that "so called evidence" has been confirmed by the Niger government. Iraqi officers did look into buying yellowcake there.
Next you use the constitution as a reason to attack President Bush. The constitution grants the president certain emergency powers. He is using those, sanctioned by congress and the courts appointed to oversee these programs. He has followed constitutional protocol. Any mistakes that were made, he either abandoned the program or changed it to meet the law. (By the way, why do democrats harp about constitutional rights, but argue that the right to bear arms is somehow not a constitutional right. At least President Bush is following the law, even if you don't like it.)
Your attack of the SPP is kind of surprising. Perhaps you should investigate the democrats solution to the border problem! I have nothing to say to such ignorance.
Allowing torture is something that I will give you. I question where you get your facts that "women and children" were tortured. I have never seen any reputable source claim this. However, it is clear that men were treated inhumanely. This is a problem and I am glad that the Bush administration when after the commanders and others responsible for this. They are now in jail. I would argue that more responsibility should be taken at the top, however, that is up for congress and the courts to decide, not public opinion.
It comes as no surprise that democrats want permission from the UN and other world organizations before we do anything in this country. I find this type of political philosophy very dangerous to the interests of the US. The fact is that no other country follows UN rules. We are all in default of something. Please do a little research on the subject before jumping to conclusions.
However, the UN did grant approval for "serious consequences" which included invasion as a possible outcome if Iraq did not comply with the UN sanctions. So again, we see a rewriting of history.

Out of many things I am not happy with in the Bush administration, it surprises me how democrats continue to use the same old lies to support their ideas. Their emotional knee jerk reactions are getting old. Instead of reacting to these perceived injustices by the Bush administration, one should learn a little about the reality of the world.

Answer 2

First saying that he didn't lie and he was mislead is a stupid excuse he is the president if he is being mislead obviously he doesn't know what's going on and he is not running this country so I'm sorry having the most powerful position as being president the responsibility is his because if he was mislead by an incompetent staff then it's his fault for not hiring a better administration or making drastic changes to the administration that mislead him whatever. When the company goes down it's the CEO that they look for answers, and if he doesn't have them then who the hell does. Makes me even less sure of his competence to be in that position.

Answer 3

Democrats workout a double common? My goodness!!! i've got no longer seen this previously! Like, for the duration of the Clinton administration, we heard the comparable people who constantly communicate approximately "kinfolk Violence" if a guy sneezes with a woman interior the room say that Clinton's mauling of particularly some females did no longer count as a results of fact it became right into a "inner maximum count between he and his spouse." of course, had it been the president of IBM, they could have sued and demanded that the "harasser" be bumped off with the aid of stockholders.... so because it truly is and occasion of... oh, wait... Democrats workout double standards...? properly, besides, that's like whilst the Democrats twisted George H. W. Bush's arm - getting him to break his "no new taxes" pledge - and then ran against him for breaking his no new taxes pledge... oh wait.... properly, at any value, it truly is precisely like lefties complaining that George W. Bush became right into a liar for appearing based on the intelligence that became into fed to him with the aid of American, British, and Israeli intelligence forces, yet noting that Clinton became into in simple terms being clever and lawyerly whilst he asked "What the which potential of is is?" and insisting that Kerry became into being completely consistent whilst he "voted for X previously vote casting against X." Hmmmmmmm. properly, ok, this time I have been given it! it truly is like whilst Democrats insisted for the duration of the Clarence Thomas hearings that "it isn't the character of the evidence, however the seriousness of the allegation" that concerns, yet then whilst invoice Clinton became into accused of raping a woman insisted it became into in simple terms a "inner maximum count." Dang. ok, you obtain me. apparently that Democrats constantly have 2 gadgets of standards. i assume I in simple terms hadn't observed previously.

Answer 4

President Bush has a soul "GET OVER IT"-

--sure wish more folk did.

Answer 5

Kelly-----thats not going to happen----have far too much respect for his intelligence and values.

Answer 6

I don't want Dubya to go away mad, just want him to go away!!

Answer 7

resign