10-8-6 for the Top-3. Why in the hell should a driver get 8 pts. for finishing second?
I think it rewards early season results far too much. If the pt. spread between the race winner and the bloke in second is 2-pts, then it's hard to close an early season gap, even if you dominate the second-half of the season.
I think the old 10-6-4 scoring is better. The point of the championship is to win races, not finish second and collect a massive 8 pts. Any comments?
2007-04-15 09:30:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Auto Racing ➔ Formula One
I totally agree with you. The 2nd place driver doesn't even try risking everything now for first place. I would change it to 10-6-3. The bigger spread would encourage more passing and for drivers not to be content in 2nd or 3rd.
2007-04-15 18:50:11 · answer #1 · answered by Rockford 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all...but the system let that the team's don't put in risk over-pass....so for the show is not good....because the drivers keep in the backward....mostly.....remember Senna,Prost,......nobody makes their moves anymore.....so in my opinion many things in F1 is boring now......the winning depends of the technology of the car.......tire,engine,brakes,...so the drivers even don't need to make the gears because is automatic and you have traction-control....so is likely a robot operate by a human......
Nicky Lauda made this comment few years ago....NOW ANY MONKEY CAN DRIVE A F1 CAR........is true?
best regards......
2007-04-15 13:57:35 · answer #2 · answered by einhander17 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
start up in secure mode and see if it freezes you are able to also do a restoration using the fix console or do a restoration set up that preserves all of your documents, some structures use F10 for fix to production unit status yet yours ought to easily be a minor application problem one lacking a million or 0 in any boot document motives residing house windows to crash it really is in basic terms yet another celebration mof negative programming from microsoft
2016-12-04 02:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by niesporek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree as far as secong place not trieing for third, but i think the bigger problem is no points for 6th and on, it encourages back markers to pack up shop on a bad day wich is bad for fans
2007-04-16 02:11:05 · answer #4 · answered by eyesinthedrk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because that way, some drivers that drive slower cars but are more consistent and their cars more reliable can have a fair distribution of points.
2007-04-15 10:04:29 · answer #5 · answered by Cavallino Silver 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no its fine the way it is. Don't screw with it.
2007-04-15 16:14:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋