Vince Young hands down, just has that intangable of winning. also great playmaker strong arm and getting more accurate. By the way VY is a MUCH better leader than matt whoever. GO LONGHORNS
2007-04-15 10:21:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by stephon J 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Vince Young because he carried a team on his shoulder. Vince could throw and scramble. Reggie Bush had a good team to work with. Matt Leinart had the receivers to work with but didnt work anythin. So it would have to be Vince Young and beauce Vince Young is just plain better and had nothing to work with and still helped the Titans to an 8-8 record. Also was selected to play in the pro bowl as a rookie QB.Hasnt been done since Dan Marino and everybody knows who he is ;)
2007-04-15 07:17:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by christianfla11 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL....Young is as fast as Bush? Dream on! Of those 3 I'd pick Leinart cause I think he'll have the longer and more productive career. Young has talent but his running style will not make for a long or real productive career (just ask Culpepper). Running QBs either change their style or they are gone is short order. Bush is a great #2 RB but because of his size I don't think he'll ever be a full time, 30+ carry a game RB. If Arizona is smart and build the right team around Leinart, as he gains experience the Cards will become a tough team.
2007-04-15 09:07:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The BEST is Reggie Bush. I use IS in the present tense because I think Matt Leinart has the potential to be the next Joe Montana or Tom Brady.
Vince Young is the most clutch, he's proven that time and time again. Leinart is the best leader, but Young has shown very good leadership qualities.
2007-04-15 07:31:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by playmaker 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mario Williams. I stated it from the day he develop into drafted. he's going to be a corridor of repute participant. He form of jogs my memory of Reggie White the way he assaults the line. The Texans have been smart to no longer draft Bush. Bush heavily isn't something greater effective than a glorified slot receiver who dances too lots in the backfield and could't hit the hollow difficult adequate by fact he's in simple terms too small. i could say Vince could have the 2nd superb after somewhat greater artwork. he will probable on no account be an precise passer, yet it is not his pastime. He runs it. Leinart will probable be the worst (even nonetheless i presumed he could be lots greater helpful than he's). He looks like he hasn't more desirable in any respect by fact that he develop into drafted, which granted develop into purely a 300 and sixty 5 days and a a million/2 in the past, yet nonetheless.
2016-12-29 13:36:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vince Young
2007-04-15 09:23:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chuck Briggs 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Vince Young had a great year, but I would have to say Reggie Bush was the best player.....stats don't show everything a player does for a team. Bush drew so much attention from the defense it help his other players (McAllister, Colston, Copper, Horn) have good years also. And he also had some tremendous plays also (TD against Bears in the playoffs) which help put his team back in game or keep the team winning. I think he'll be a Marshall Faulk type back who'll only get better...!!!!!
2007-04-15 07:24:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by 50/50 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
We will never see how good Matt will be. He is stuck on a very very bad team and he cant do it all himself. Reggie is fast and might become one of the best ever. Time will tell. Now we get to Vince Young. My god he is a bad azz. This kid is going to be outstanding. In five years from now we are going to be talking about him being one of the best ever.Jim
2007-04-15 07:23:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by gooch44975 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can only compare Vince and Matt because they are QBs. Reggie is a RB. Vince Young is the best overall though.
2007-04-15 09:47:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by J.A. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Matt Leinart
2007-04-15 07:23:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by finfan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋