English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do because men represent power and authority, plus men were meant to be in charge.

2007-04-15 06:48:05 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

'had' should be presence tense 'has'

2007-04-15 06:49:12 · update #1

*present tense

2007-04-15 06:49:44 · update #2

22 answers

Hmmmmmmm

Hatshepsut, Sammuramat, Joan of Arc, Eleanor of Aquitane, Isabele 1 of Castile, Margaret Thatcher, Mary Queen of Scots, Elizabeths 1 & 2, Victoria, Amina, Cathering de Medici, Catherine the Great, Tzu-Hsi, Golda Meir, Liliuokalani, Indira Gandhi, Melisende Queen of Jerusalem, Empress Wu Zetian, Queen Sondok, Shagrat al-Durr, Eleonora of Arborea , Empress Irene, Empress Isabella of Portugal, Christina of Sweden, Lozen, Queen Suriyothai, Alexandra Federovna Romanov, Crown Princess Sophia, Anne de Beaujeu, Margaret, Byzantine Empress and Regent/Queen of Thessaloniki, Servilia, Queen Salamasina, Deborah, Nana Yaa Asantewaa, Zawditu, Empress of Ethiopia, Zenobia, Theodora, Pulcheria, Zoe, Queen Didda, Audata of Thrace, Olympias, Queen in Epirus and mother of Alexander the Great, Agrippina the Younger, Candace, the Ethiopian Empress, Queen Boadicea, Zulu Queen Nandi, Razia Sultana, Jhansi Ki Rani, Maria Theresa of Hapsburg, Gro Harlem (married name Brundtland), Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Sri Lanka, Sila Maria Calderon, Empress Wu Chao, Empress Himiko, Wilma Mankiller, Khaleda Zia , Ms. Sheikh Hasina, Benazir Bhutto, The four Madagascar Queens, Empress Elisabeth of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Artemesia, Cartimandau , Arachidamia , Zabibi and Samsi of Arabia, Mavia, The Kahina, Aethelflaed, Nanye-hi - “Beloved Woman".

There are more of course but I figure I have made a point about being in charge.

Anyhow, dear Sandstorm, I would love to stand you up in front of any of the ladies listed above and ask you to make your above statement and watch the fur fly!

There are ALWAYS EXCEPTIONS to every rule!

2007-04-15 07:12:22 · answer #1 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 1 0

no, because that is sexist, and what about Queen Elizabeth 1st she did a better job at being queen then either her younger brother or older sister. Besides if men were the dominate sex how come they mostly get the gene diseases like and can't handle much pain and men are more likely to be Homophobic. And all of these are facts proven by scientists so don't say otherwise.

2007-04-15 06:56:24 · answer #2 · answered by greenseersika 3 · 1 0

i think that the firstborn newborn should be the single to inherit the throne. If it takes position to be a daughter and he or she marries, she keeps the throne. Her husband could no longer immediately rule as he's not of the royal blood line. the in elementary words individual who could get the throne from her is her firstborn newborn, or the nearest relative of her bloodline who she deems worth.

2016-12-04 01:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

How about, when the time comes that the throne is empty, we take a look at how well the heirs have performed their duties? Dispite age and dispite gender, let it be decided who would fill that position the best.

2007-04-15 07:03:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Dude you're asking for a good @ss kicking saying that. Don't you know women rule. Behind the scenes mostly. But I guarantee if there not in charge you won't get any nookie. Yes even you will do what ever they say just to get some...Unless you're gay. Then you're opinion just doesn't matter...

2007-04-15 06:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I think the whole concept of "royalty" is archaic and dumb. But if it must persist (as a toursit attraction?) then the oldest (male or female) should be the heir.

2007-04-15 06:55:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the heir to the thrown should be whoever the current king/ queen thinks is the best candidate.

2007-04-15 06:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, as a republican I believe there should not be a royal throne in the first place.

2007-04-15 06:52:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The heir to our royal porcelin throne is the next standing in line... reguardless of gender...

2007-04-15 06:52:14 · answer #9 · answered by aagirl 4 · 1 1

Yes I do..because the male carry the family name...the women carry their husband's name

2007-04-15 07:07:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers