2007-04-15 06:27:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes it sure is.They don't care if you hear anything or not. They will even have their hearing if you aren't there.
But your pun was clever, thanks for the laugh.
2007-04-15 06:33:11 · answer #1 · answered by asmikeocsit 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know this was a joke, but an FYI, if a deaf person goes to court the court has to provide a sign language interpreter for that person.
2007-04-15 13:31:01 · answer #2 · answered by LawandOrder 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont know if you ment it as a joke or not but if you are seious. yes it is still called a hearing. the deaf person hears with their eyes and talk with their hands. the interpreter makes sure that the judge hears the side of the deaf person and relays what the judge and other parties are saying back to him/her
2007-04-15 13:37:43 · answer #3 · answered by wlfbelcher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The judge is "hearing" the arguments from both sides. But can a judge be deaf or is being able to hear a job requirement?
2007-04-15 13:44:47 · answer #4 · answered by Mike M. 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The deaf person is not the one doing the hearing it is the judge who must hear the case. Nice try at a sick joke but it didn't fly.
2007-04-15 13:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-04-15 13:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by arenaimage 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol thats pretty funny but yes
hearing like many english words hav diff meanings but that was a clever play on words.
but he might be called the deafendant
2007-04-15 13:31:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's called a signing because it aided by sign language.
2007-04-15 13:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, of course.
2007-04-15 13:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol. You should have put that under Jokes. Funny.
2007-04-15 13:30:38 · answer #10 · answered by Lomoco 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋