For simple-minded folk, euthanizing is a special term for "killing."
Just answer yes or no.
2007-04-15
06:14:30
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Polls & Surveys
http://www.nokillnow.com/PETAIngridNewkirkResign.htm
http://steelturman.typepad.com/thesteeldeal/2005/10/peta_animal_cru.html
http://www.watchfarscape.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34388
2007-04-15
06:25:25 ·
update #1
Alda: 1991? That was 16 years ago. I love how you only look at the information which best benefits your own personal stance on the topic.
"Note the steady increase in the rate of PETA's killing since 1998. And these are just the deaths PETA admits to."
"There she hauled in more than 17,822 puppies, kittens, dogs and cats since 1998 and executed 14,419 of them ... In 2005 Newkirk killed 90% of her defenseless captives and adopted only 6% - a ratio far worse than almost any pound in the country."
Those are direct excerpts from the same source you quoted from.
2007-04-15
15:04:54 ·
update #2
"A former PETA employee told a reporter: "a teary-eyed man showed up at PETA headquarters one day with his beloved pet rabbit. The man had grown old and sick and was no longer able to care properly for his friend. He supplied a cage, bed, toys, and even vet records for this pet. He was assured by PETA workers that they would take "good care" of his rabbit and find him a home. The man left distraught but no doubt believing that his friend would be able to live out the rest of his life in a loving, compassionate home...PETA workers carried him to the 'death house' immediately and ended his life!" The employee said there are many similar examples."
Does that sound like the right choice?
2007-04-15
15:05:55 ·
update #3