English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For simple-minded folk, euthanizing is a special term for "killing."

Just answer yes or no.

2007-04-15 06:14:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

http://www.nokillnow.com/PETAIngridNewkirkResign.htm
http://steelturman.typepad.com/thesteeldeal/2005/10/peta_animal_cru.html
http://www.watchfarscape.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34388

2007-04-15 06:25:25 · update #1

Alda: 1991? That was 16 years ago. I love how you only look at the information which best benefits your own personal stance on the topic.

"Note the steady increase in the rate of PETA's killing since 1998. And these are just the deaths PETA admits to."

"There she hauled in more than 17,822 puppies, kittens, dogs and cats since 1998 and executed 14,419 of them ... In 2005 Newkirk killed 90% of her defenseless captives and adopted only 6% - a ratio far worse than almost any pound in the country."

Those are direct excerpts from the same source you quoted from.

2007-04-15 15:04:54 · update #2

"A former PETA employee told a reporter: "a teary-eyed man showed up at PETA headquarters one day with his beloved pet rabbit. The man had grown old and sick and was no longer able to care properly for his friend. He supplied a cage, bed, toys, and even vet records for this pet. He was assured by PETA workers that they would take "good care" of his rabbit and find him a home. The man left distraught but no doubt believing that his friend would be able to live out the rest of his life in a loving, compassionate home...PETA workers carried him to the 'death house' immediately and ended his life!" The employee said there are many similar examples."

Does that sound like the right choice?

2007-04-15 15:05:55 · update #3

19 answers

No

2007-04-15 06:16:57 · answer #1 · answered by multipły 6 · 0 0

the superb no-kill shelters have a euthansia fee of approximately 6%. PETA has a euthanasia fee of approximately ninety%. Animals that are too ill or have a terminal ailment are frequently placed to sleep, by fact is the kindest element to do. in spite of the undeniable fact that, PETA euthanizes completely healthful, adoptable pets. In some circumstances, they euthanize the animal previously they even go away the previous proprietor's sources (as in the case with Hinkle and cook dinner). i do no longer understand why they are nonetheless around. that's probable by fact if the thousands and thousands of brainwashed followers they have accrued. do no longer difficulty with them. With adequate human beings turning their backs to PETA, perchance we are able to close them down.

2016-12-29 13:29:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A) The burden of proof is on you.

B) If they are killing certain animals what is the condition that they have come in on? It could be appropriate in certain extreme circumstances.

C) Unless these animals are vegetarian and require meat PETA would have to advocate killing other animals just to feed them.

D) In conclusion there might be complicated factors to why or why not you are correct. So before you go on a witch hunt please do and provide a little more research.

Edit: If the links you send are indeed true I have changed my mind about PETA and will not support them anymore. It seems according to there own statistics it is not just isolated cases but in fact the rule. This is ironically tragic. Thank you for your diligence in providing those of us who care with truthful information.

2007-04-15 06:23:50 · answer #3 · answered by Love of Truth 5 · 0 2

Yes. Did you know the associate and fund domestic terrorist organizations and they send terrorists into schools and colleges to talk to the kids (oh, and teach them how to make a bomb so that they can go and blow stuff up).

2007-04-15 12:45:29 · answer #4 · answered by kungfufighting66 5 · 0 0

Yes!

2007-04-15 06:19:55 · answer #5 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0 0

Did you know that most animals put in their care are already traumatized? Did you know that misinformation is not good? Sorry you will not pick mine but had to come in anyway..try this link....please people work hard to help...

This is what worries me...see Stricken below..I am a huge advocate of animal rights.

2007-04-15 06:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by ஐAldaஐ 6 · 3 2

Yes, I just found that out.

2007-04-15 06:25:02 · answer #7 · answered by spiritcavegrl 7 · 0 0

I suspected it and believe you. They can not possibly care for all those animals. Could you please give me a link to some supporting evidence or tell me how you know this, just so I may use it as evidence when I talk to others. I don't care who get picked for best answer, just please give me your source.

2007-04-15 06:22:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

yes

2007-04-15 06:18:07 · answer #9 · answered by got all I need 5 · 0 0

That's sad. There's room for all of God's creatures.....right next to the mashed potatoes.

2007-04-15 06:21:10 · answer #10 · answered by Cochran 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers