because he wasn't to pussified to stand up to militant Islam
2007-04-15 06:08:37 · 21 answers · asked by Deer Slayer 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush will go down in history as the worst president. He has no redeeming qualities that could counter that assessment. It is highly unlikely that he will do anything after his presidency to redeem his reputation. His administration has been a huge step backwards for this country. The Iraq disaster would be enough but he has so many more areas in which he has been a complete failure.
2007-04-22 10:40:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. He and his predecesor will most likely be remembered as those that bred a new generation of militant ideologues through their inaccurate understanding and inappropriate responses to the real problem at hand. We are are not fighting a religion, but are fighting those that happen to use a religion [islam] and twist it to fit their own political power agendas. Our policies, not our beliefs, civics or culture has created the militants we face. Unfortunatly our policies are adding fuel to the fire. Take Iraq, a complete sideshow that has nothing to do with fighting terrorism or religious militancy, yet we went in anyway, even though Iraq had a no link to 9/11 or Al Qaeda. Fighting in Iraq does nothing to fight militant Islam, it only drains resources necessary to fight the real war against religious militancy of all stripes and shades. Remember Sun Tzu, true war is not only fought on the battlefield... and we are currently failing off the battlefield and on (remember the objective... fight militant Islam? How does being in Iraq accomplish that objective currently? Answer it honestly).
Furthermore, those Islamic militants we fight... we created the vast majority of them and the mechanisms of their operational success back in the 80's when we stoked the religious fervor to fight communism. Yep that's right historial documented fact. We then proceeded to leave them in a vaccuum where malignancy nurtured greater malignancy into Al Qaeada. In effect, we are fighting our own one time creation. Ask George Bush SR. who requested and tried to fill the vaccum but was denied by Congress and then the following Clinton admin to 'pocket the so called 'peace dividend'. Welcome to Blowback 101.
2007-04-23 01:14:35 · answer #2 · answered by cbgaviniii 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well first he should try going after the right militant islam like bin laden then we could have worked our way to Iraq but he will definately go down as the biggest embarrassment where political leaders are concerned. Bill Clinton not as corrupt please all he ever got nabbed for was getting a little special attention in the oval office and you and I know that given the opportunity doing it in the oval office would be awesome.
Hello to anyone paying attention thousands are being killed we are in a war??????? where do you people come from.
2007-04-22 18:20:11 · answer #3 · answered by Y 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it really is going to remember on the writers and publishers of the destiny heritage books. Bush replaced into fiscally a disaster yet replaced into an astonishing chief in the course of one among our countries brilliant catastrophes 9-11. maximum of what we see about Bush at the moment notwithstanding is by ability of the red-tinted lenses of the unabashedly biased media. He ought to be the scapegoat for all of u . s . a .'s ills on the instantaneous or the present president will start up to look quite undesirable.
2016-12-04 01:52:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. If anything, George Bush has further radicalized Islam with his blundering and apparent one-sidedness in favor of Israel. Because of his actions, the United States has been robbed of being perceived as an "honest broker" in the Middle East.
2007-04-23 04:52:38 · answer #5 · answered by tamarindwalk 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yep, the history books will be kind to Pres. Bush, nothing pussified about him.
2007-04-23 05:59:21 · answer #6 · answered by impalersca 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your great, great, great grandchildren will know about what an awful president he was been when they are still fighting this damn war in a 100 years.
2007-04-22 18:35:28 · answer #7 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He will go down in history for cronyism and war profiteering - and for wasting precious lives in incompetent whack-a-mole efforts when true diplomacy and multi national police efforts quell the violence after he leaves office.
2007-04-16 05:42:45 · answer #8 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No but he will do down in history as the most confused, incompetent, idiotic, moronic, ineffective, loser president ever!
2007-04-22 15:58:21 · answer #9 · answered by JoJo 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. I'll be glad when he goes down in history though.
Let's hope our history will continue to be written in English.
2007-04-23 01:43:43 · answer #10 · answered by sal 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋