Are you pro or con the war on terrrorism?

Question

Why or why not? Insights please.

Answer 1

i am 100% for fighting terrorism BUT the way bush is fighting it is all wrong #1 we need to label terrorism as a criminal act
#2 treat terrorists as criminals and punish them swiftly & severely dealing with the individual not taking aggresion out on entire regions that creates more terrorist
#3 for those areas where terrorist come from show them an extended hand of peace violence spawns hatred & revenge education will show people peace is rational
#4 go to the source its muslims who hate us but they do have people of authority get them to come forth & have open public & televised meetings with someone who will represent us intelligently who will show how weak & self destructive & illogical their course of actions are, there are a TON of more ideas i have but i gtg msg me back if u want more info & ideas

Answer 2

When you say the "war on terrorism", you can't be limiting yourself to Iraq or Afghanistan. The war on Terrorism is a global fight. Terrorists are in every country. Read today's headlines. Casablanca was attacked, a woman in Norway was attacked because she brought to light, the horror approved of by some of the radical extremists. Terrorism is everywhere, so How can you NOT be for the elimination of terror?

Answer 3

For me, the war on terrorism starts at home at our borders, not in another country. So I am pro war on terrorism, but I am against the war in Iraq.

Answer 4

Con. It's a senseless war. Iraq did not attack us. None of the terrorists on 9-11 were Iraqi. There was absolutely no reason to go there. There were no WMD. There is no reason for us still to be there. We're not going to win this war and people are getting killed left and right...for nothing.

Answer 5

you either fight them and track them or they come here and kill you. by the way you dont punish terrorists like children, you kill them.