2007-04-15 05:37:27 · 23 answers · asked by DeuceRider 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You were right the first time, they are commies!
2007-04-15 05:43:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Communism does not equal liberalism. Communism does not even equal socialism, claim though it might. Communism is fascism under another name.
Answering a question with a question is an example of rhetoric. It invites you to consider another facet of your argument. Perhaps it's more common among liberals because they are less willing to blindly follow and so are more likely to question. But by all means I don't have to put a question in any answer.
As I have just done. You have yourself a great day.
2007-04-15 05:42:11 · answer #2 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do Bushevic make us want to be like the commies?
I suppose you like it when your job gets outsourced to a thirdworld country that can do the same work you do for pennies on the dollar.
The problem with the Bushevics is that they outsourced America. Before long we will have Islamic Terrorists running our borders, because they can do it much cheaper. Did the light bulb go on for ya yet?
2007-04-15 05:41:52 · answer #3 · answered by andy r 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
your buddies like hannity like to spend 5 minutes asking there guests a question and expect a answer in 5 seconds. what they always do is cut them of and ask them to give a yes or no answer. there like lawyers. So if they are going to make the question very detailed oriented and then expect a blunt answer so they can just corner them in a debate just to win not to be right then the only thing left for a liberal in there shoes to do is answer in a question so they can do the same thing to them to show them how ****** up it is.
2007-04-15 05:50:01 · answer #4 · answered by chingow 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I like to think that questioning brings about thought and thought brings change; hopefully change for the better. I'm don't consider myself anything as far as politics go b/c I like to be open to all possibilities, but if both sides ask more questions of each other and themselves, maybe it'll be better for the voters:)
2007-04-15 05:42:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If shrink taxes are continuously the respond, why are we coping with the matters we've collectively as Federal taxes are at historic lows? precise now our Federal taxes are the backside they have been in fifty to sixty years (consistent with the way it truly is calculated) yet we've been close to to to a melancholy rather some short months interior the previous. In answer on your question: shrink taxes could propose extra suitable funds indoors the pocket of persons --- yet probable no longer -- in simple terms with the aid of actuality lots of the social training have been eradicated to pay for those shrink taxes, for this reason some actual have much less funds to spend. shrink taxes to the rather-wealthy could propose extra suitable funds of their wallet, even yet it does no longer propose that they are going to spend any extra suitable, for this reason the utter failure of the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy to stimulate the economic equipment. finally, greater sales do no longer unavoidably propose extra suitable tax sales. lots of the main significant rewarding business company in this u . s . a . pay little or no taxes with the aid of using coming up use of multiple criminal tax dodging maneuvers, for this reason no count extensive form how plenty their earnings is, they pay no longer extra suitable tax. between the large precise wing myths is that the U. S. business company taxes are the optimal indoors the international. The tax costs would possibly be severe, despite the fact that the actual taxes paid with the aid of using companies doing corporation in this u . s . a . is often rather low, rather, as low a nil.
2016-12-16 06:25:08 · answer #6 · answered by goslin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Lib...why don't you take a long walk on a short pier?
It's funny that you say the Libs have no answer...I see many full answers to questions and far fewer full answers from Cons...this is an example of a meaningless question...you are refering to some insulting questions by the Cons like this one...
2007-04-15 05:39:49 · answer #7 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Like this: What do you call an Adm. that throws three Border Agents in prison with 2 sentences longer than a murderer?
(bought off)
2007-04-15 05:42:02 · answer #8 · answered by truthorcon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are you suggesting? Is that a typo or a double entendre?
Go Team Red Go
2007-04-15 05:41:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In order to point out the stupidity in the original question.
2007-04-15 05:40:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋