They cry like nappy headed ho's.
2007-04-15 05:03:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Earl 3
·
3⤊
7⤋
Denial is the refusal to believe or accept the reality that certain events have happened, are happening, or will happen. To accept the reality would bring emotional pain, so the events are denied. Related to denial is the defense called minimizing. Events are accepted, but only in a watered down version. ..
There are several defining characteristics that identify the possibility that a patient may be in denial. Some examples include pretending something does not exist when in reality it does. Being willing to admit there is a problem, but unwilling to see the severity of it. Seeing the problem as being caused by something or someone else. The behavior is not denied, but its cause is someone else's responsibility. Offering excuses, alibis, justifications, and other explanations for behavior. Dealing with the problem on a general level; avoiding personal and emotional awareness of the situations or conditions. Changing the subject to avoid threatening topics. Becoming angry and irritable when reference is made to the condition. These defining characteristics help to avoid the issue at hand
2007-04-15 05:08:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
We do indeed understand. What we don't get is why you libs get your panties in a wad when we point out all the really bad, really crooked, really reprehensible things that your tribals leaders have done. Take, for instance, the news about the Chinese shooting down a satellite with anti-satellite missle technology. It's all over the news today but what the stories are leaving out is that Billybob gave them all that top secret technology in return for campaign donations made to him, to Hillary and to the Democratic party. These traitors sold us down the river for a few bucks so Bill could go on forcing himself on young women. Don't even try denying that it happened, it was all over the news at the time.
2007-04-15 05:20:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not aware that I was "irate." However, this week end from your side of the party, I seen post's that call for the murder of our troops,president,Rove,VP, "tribal leader" and other assorted people you consider as scoundrels of ill repute.
Perhaps one of these days the un-biased Liberal party will afford us the luxury of free speach. Perhaps we need another Ronnie in office that has the ability to stomp out communism/socialism.
When will it be ok for us to have freedom of speach, just like you? Will answer it for you. Never. If we think different than you, it's ok to shut us up anyway you can.
It's not working!!!
2007-04-15 05:21:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
this question is obviously telling me that Democrats and Liberals are very misunderstood via you. it incredibly is telling me which you're a follower who posts the comparable previous sweeping generalizations persistently back when you consider which you want interest. it incredibly is telling me which you have an fantastically closed strategies. much extra frightening - it incredibly is telling me that those corrupt government officers who're having a danger on the yankee peoples branch via pitting us against one yet another is working. there is center floor between us, stop performing like Republicans and Democrats are mortal enemies - we are actually not - all of us desire a miles better usa, yet we can't ever get it till we be taught the thank you to artwork jointly and compromise. Be unswerving on your united states and it incredibly is human beings - to no longer your government and political social gathering.
2016-10-22 05:39:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why did liberals become irate when Clinton got criticized? It's the fact that he is the face of the party, what he does reflects on the party (whether he's making an idiot of himself on national t.v. or receiving indecent favors from a white house intern), and nobody likes to be told that their duly elected leader is a moron or a womanizer. This is why I'm happy I am an independent. Independent thought for an independent way of life with no restrictions to party platforms and party lines.
2007-04-15 05:07:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert L 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
I sure like what Earl the Canadian said up there. I'm with him, Conservatives cry like baby's
2007-04-15 06:56:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
For the same reason that Lemmings become irate when I criticize their hero Speaker Pelosi.
:D
2007-04-15 05:04:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Cult of Personality 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
Which one the monkey or the one who cannot distinguish colors or shapes, or is it the one who dances at parties and sings
2007-04-15 05:05:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Overly sensitive to the facts on the ground.
2007-04-15 05:08:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
lies all lies,,,where never committed,many laws,no laws where ever broken.go team bush go
2007-04-15 05:07:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by decider JR 3
·
0⤊
0⤋