The philosopher Bertrand Russell invented the conundrum of the teapot.
Basically he said that he has faith that somewhere in the outer solar system, a fine china teapot orbits the sun. Then he challenged that he refused to renounce believe in this cosmic teapot until someone proved him wrong.
Obviously Bertrand Russell didn't believe in that teapot, but he did it to prove a point. That some people will fabricate knowledge, and then as a cop-out place the burden of disproving it on others. Could you disprove Russell's teapot? I sure as heck couldn't. But Russell used this obviously rediculous premise as a valid point.
These New World Order tin-pots are just like them. They come up with these elaborate conspiracy theories, then profess their word as the truth, challenging anyone to disprove them. It's an admirable defense, I mean, what does a man have to do, inquire into every minute of every day into the lives of rich people? But in reality it is just a betrayal of truth, because the evidence supported is sketchy and unbelievable, and rather than continue to support his arguement with facts, as is the way it happens in the real scientific world, he just defaults to an impressionable population to disprove it.
If knowing that these charlatans have betrayed all modern notions regarding the gathering of information doesn't sway you, then perhaps this can:
the fact that you can google these theories, and the fact that you and the founders of the theory are still alive, should add tremendous evidence to the fact that it is hogwash. I mean, seriously, if they really wanted to take over the world, do you think causing some interlopers to have a few 'accidents' would be above them?
Furthermore, if they really had some grand world-wide scheme planned, do you really think that all the governments and all the intelligence agencies and all the state and local police forces and all the information technologies companies would have missed it, while some blokes in their mother's basemen was able to piece it together? If there is one thing history tells us, it's that people in general are notoriously bad secret keepers.
I hope that helps. I don't know of any websites disproving them, only because I don't think there is anything that needs to be disproved, and most people realize that what they say is complete nonesense.
2007-04-15 05:00:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The thing is that there is some underlying truth in that globalism is a movement pursued ravenously by those (the rich) for whom it would be an advantage.
Since many of the poor in the world have little education, they are easy to lead with flashy gifts without substance, and the globalists cover themself with a cloth that what they are doing is for the benefit of the world's poorest (by pushing the standards of the rest of the working world to the level of the second poorest.)
The idea that Bones members at Yale speak of takeover and world wide domination rather than drinking until they puke and making friendships they later pick up again as businessmen is a bit silly. (Have you ever MET any Bones members?) However, education will show them, and us, which side their and our bread is buttered on. They do better if our wages aren't as high, hence outsourcing and 'free trade' vs. 'fair trade.'
I don't know that it is a conspiracy. I think they say it is for the good of all, because the 'economy grows' without looking at details. Details like the fact that wages are the smallest percent of gross domestic product in the US than at any time since WW II (and prior to that was the great depression.) That was from the Fed, I didn't make it up. Also, our number of people living in 'severe poverty' has recently doubled.
The globalists ( I refuse to call them 'illuminati') were shocked, and sure it was an accounting glitch of some kind. I mean the best people can have accounting glitches, right? I mean, look at Enron....
2007-04-15 04:51:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by DAR 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Debunking New World Order
2016-11-01 23:00:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"There also seems to be occult symbolism everywhere in the media, like on TV shows, movies, music videos, video games etc. Why are they there? Somebody rational and logical please explain to me." Symbols don't have any innate meaning outside of their particular appliance. Just because a symbol coincides somewhere else doesn't mean it was applied the same(with the same meaning). You might care to read about Wittgenstein's meaning-is-use thesis. "And there's also this card game by Steve Jacksons, the cards seem to be able to predict the future, and some of the cards are really scary." How are you determining that they are predicting the future beyond the means of someone creating a narrative about the future that they believe could happen? "There's also a lot of people claiming that we are in the Last Days and that the world would end in our lifetime. That freaks me out. " People have been referring to that prediction in scripture for almost 2,000 years now, claiming that it would be the last days. However Jesus said he would come back within one generation(Matthew 24:34), and that never happened. But believers still can't get over this fact. What makes you/them any less wrong than all the previous generations claiming the exact same thing, based on the same erroneous scripture?
2016-04-01 02:40:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Project for a New American Century can't be debunked because it is a real republican project. The goal is to use armed forces to increase the influence of the US in the world.
The basic idea is to use the military to enter troubled areas and then sign up American corporations to fulfill contracts in those areas using local resources that the some of the locals would share the profits from to make it look legit.
It is a lot more complex than that as it is a running an ever changing strategy, but you get the idea.
Hell it even has its own website.
2007-04-15 04:49:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
You can't exactly debunk something which is out in plain site genius. GWB's dad spoke of having a New World Order amazingly on 9/11/91. He spoke of it other times too, but this was the innaugration of the proposal.
Sept. 2000, the good ol' PNAC document that talks about globalization in it, and that proposals for middle east projects would take years unless there happened to be a new Pearl Harbor event to speed up the process. We all know and remember what happened a year later.....
Then on 9/12/01 at a conference for the CFR they talked about using this tragedy for creating what George H. W. Bush said about a New World Order.
History has a funny way of repeating itself. The global elite want ultimate power and control and are doing everything in their power to carry it out.
Oh by the way, the BS site of screwloosechange.com is a sham and they've even admitted it. Popular Mechanics is owned by Hurst Publishing and were the pioneers in yellow journalism. Their report and FEMA's report contradict eachother. Also, thanks to a real hero of 9/11 by the name of William Rodriguez who was a janitor of the WTC who had 1 of only 5 master keys to the complex helped firefighters up the towers and he personally helped out 15people.
Right now, he travels the globe talking about his experience on that fateful day and guess what... From what he's said about percentage wise about other countries saying that 9/11 was an inside job. He replied 99%!!!!
Never forget, Hitler once spoke of the people will believe a big lie rather than a small one.
2007-04-15 05:02:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
8⤊
0⤋
Just because it is labeled a conspiracy theory doesn't mean there isn't a conspiracy. Remember, the goal of the rich and those in power is always to keep their position and increase it, at all costs.
2007-04-15 04:46:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ceprn 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
if reality if getting you down, try taking up drinking.
after a while, drinking will be a problem that you will really have to deal with.
but at least you won't be depressed about the corporate takeover of the world...
2007-04-15 04:56:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Stop taking the red pill. Just f*ck it and take the blue pill.
2007-04-15 04:54:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
if u can't deal with reality, take a break. unplug your computer. and then check out albert pike. when u are ready.
2007-04-15 04:39:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stormy 4
·
2⤊
1⤋