What if build preassure tower using wind to project shuttle in outer space?

Question

I was rethinking my previous idea with magnetic tunel, so I found out that air friction would be a problem... While atempts to solve it out by sucking air from top and adding preassure from bottom I get on this idea to fully use wind preassure... I quicly noticed that preassure must be huge and added in proper doses so the new concepts rises... At present I think of few large wind colectors – funnels – with shape of half cone compressing air force and transporting it by tunels to tower summing it in one tunel aimed in sky... I guess the localization plays important role and it would be good to use strong seson/periodical winds... Can you use this idea or you are still weak to build such simple, very old (dont ask from where I suspect it comes) space shuttle projector? If you cant... then... I made mistake by coming to this world... and by making atempts to leave something behind for you and for your children... By the way repeling magnetic force can be used to avoid crashes inside tunel... The shuttle can have folding bottom – opening by wind force and closing from air friction after projecting into atmosphere... I know idea demands tests... all tests... but I know it works... like wind from world beginning... I only want to know if you understand, can develope it into ready wonder and can use it... Outer Space is still waiting...

Still... What if add tunels providing wind force around vent on top of tower to create some kind of sucking force and pushing up air force ? I think it would make some kind of air hiting reductor... And I was thinking about shape of tear – 100% streamlined... And I heard rumors that there are materials capable to survive such heat... without mentioning that I sugest construction of shuttle to be melted from one piece... If not passangers then why not cargo? – sometimes heavy what makes cost of sending bigger...

Answer 1

actually the MAGLIF tech. will not cause a friction problem because the ship will be floating on the magnetic field "tack" now if you use multiple MAGLIF tracks all around the device in a vacuum tunnel then the ship will bolt out like bullet at incredible speed,

Answer 2

Well, it is obvious that you have been thinking some more. That is good. What you need, however is more fundamental knowledge in the fields of physics and mechanics. With a good education in those areas you would instantly recognize that construction of any tower taller than about a mile high would be impossible in todays world due to the massive compression forces on the base structure, and movement of the upper sections of the tower relative to the base.

Launches of man made objects, vehicles, and other things into orbit in Space require the objects to reach velocities in excess of 25,000 miles per hour. Velocities in that range cannot be obtained using wind as a propellant force even if a funnel shaped wind tunnel and launch tube were used. I suggest that the wind force you might capture would destroy the funnel and launch tube rather quickly. Consider the effects of hurricanes and tornados which strike land masses from time to time and obliterate everything within their path. Winds within those storms exceed 160 Miles Per Hour, but never come close to the 25,000 Miles Per Hour your idea requires.

Yes, outer space is still waiting. And, i suspect that it will continue to wait for a better and more refined idea to come along.

Have a nice day.

Answer 3

Even traveling at twice the speed of sound the heat caused by friction from the air caused the Concorde to expand by several cms and used about half its engine powers just to keep the fuselage cool enough for the passengers.
To escape earths gravity a vehicle would need to fly at 33 times the speed of sound and even if you could accelerate your spacecraft to that speed in an airless and frictionless tunnel the moment it hits the air it would be like hitting a brickwall. Like a meteor except going upwards instead of down. Your airless tunnel would have to be so high that a majority of earths atmosphere would be beneath it so that the remaining air wouldn´t have enough density to make your craft disintegrate.

Answer 4

maximum governments have strict limits as to what constitutes an area motor vehicle. some years in the past earlier the Ansari x prize substitute into gained via Bert Rutan I visited famous guy or woman chaser Industries in Hyde Manchester. There I found out that specific styles of technologies wasn't allowed for use via different than the militia. i.e. engines that have been able to gimbling (the motor is actual suggested in preference to the rocket being suggested via wings and so on). the reason given for this substitute into that governments did no longer choose this way of technologies to "fall into the 'incorrect' palms", for this reason why maximum x-prize entrants went down the line of re-usable area-airplane form craft in preference to a re-usable rocket. i assume additionally that as quickly as any independant rocketeers have been discovered to be construction thier very own area-craft well-being and protection inspectorates might quickly substitute into in touch too. in simple terms that component of interference is sufficient to place each physique off.